Literature DB >> 9876021

Effects of cryopreservation on bull sperm head morphometry.

C G Gravance1, R Vishwanath, C Pitt, D L Garner, P J Casey.   

Abstract

Artificial insemination using cryopreserved semen is a common management tool of the contemporary livestock producer. However, cryopreservation is detrimental to sperm function and fertility, killing some 50% of the spermatozoa during the process. Prediction of cryopreservation damage from prefreeze samples remains elusive. Computer-automated sperm head morphometry was used in this study to determine the effects of cryopreservation on bovine sperm head morphometry. Semen was collected from 18 bulls and was divided. One portion was extended to 200 x 10(6) sperm/ml and a microscope slide was prepared, while the remaining portion was cryopreserved in a Triscitrate-yolk extender. After thawing, the cryopreserved samples were prepared on microscope slides. All slides were air dried and were stained with hematoxylin and rose bengal. The morphometric dimensions for length, width, width/length, area, and perimeter for a minimum of 200 sperm heads were analyzed from each slide by computer-aided sperm head morphometry analysis, and the mean measurements were recorded. Bull sperm heads were significantly (P < 0.01) smaller in cryopreserved spermatozoa than in the companion extended samples for length (8.56+/-0.07 vs. 8.63+/-0.08 microm), width (4.39+/-0.05 vs. 4.48+/-0.05 microm), area (28.42+/-0.07 vs. 29.14+/-0.08 microm), and perimeter (23.33+/-0.21 vs. 23.70+/-0.23 microm) for all bulls. Width/length was also different (0.513 vs. 0.519). In addition, differences (P < 0.05) were found within 14 of 18 bulls for at least four of the morphometric parameters. The percent change in measures after cryopreservation were correlated (P < or = 0.05) to the variability of the extended sample. Variations in sperm head measurements were lower (P < or = 0.05) in extended samples of the four bulls in which no changes occurred than in extended samples of the remaining 14 bulls. These data suggest that the variability in sperm head measurements of individual bulls, or ejaculates, may be an indicator of sperm cryosurvivability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9876021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Androl        ISSN: 0196-3635


  6 in total

1.  High-throughput cryopreservation of spermatozoa of blue catfish (Ictalurus furcatus): Establishment of an approach for commercial-scale processing.

Authors:  E Hu; Huiping Yang; Terrence R Tiersch
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 2.487

2.  Sperm cell population dynamics in ram semen during the cryopreservation process.

Authors:  Manuel Ramón; M Dolores Pérez-Guzmán; Pilar Jiménez-Rabadán; Milagros C Esteso; Olga García-Álvarez; Alejandro Maroto-Morales; Luis Anel-López; Ana J Soler; M Rocío Fernández-Santos; J Julián Garde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Characterization of Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) Sperm Based on Morphometric Traits.

Authors:  María Del Carmen Fuentes-Albero; Silvia Abril Sánchez; José Luis Ros-Santaella; Eliana Pintus; Chiara Luongo; Sara Ruiz Díaz; Carlos Barros García; María Jesús Sánchez Calabuig; Daniel García Párraga; Francisco Alberto García Vázquez
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22

Review 4.  Current status and potential of morphometric sperm analysis.

Authors:  Alejandro Maroto-Morales; Olga García-Álvarez; Manuel Ramón; Felipe Martínez-Pastor; M Rocío Fernández-Santos; A Josefa Soler; José Julián Garde
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  The effect of false mount on quality of frozen-thawed semen in Bos indicus beef bulls.

Authors:  Worapong Pongsiri; Janyaporn Rungruangsak; Sameer D Pant; Cyril P Stephen
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 1.267

6.  Ultra-rapid cooling of ibex sperm by spheres method does not induce a vitreous extracellular state and increases the membrane damages.

Authors:  Paula Bóveda; Adolfo Toledano-Díaz; Cristina Castaño; Milagros Cristina Esteso; Antonio López-Sebastián; Dimitrios Rizos; Alejandro Bielli; Rodolfo Ungerfeld; Julián Santiago-Moreno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.