Literature DB >> 9875774

Permanent cardiac pacing after a cardiac operation: predicting the use of permanent pacemakers.

R S Gordon1, J Ivanov, G Cohen, A L Ralph-Edwards.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The need for permanent cardiac pacing after cardiac operations is infrequent but associated with increased morbidity and resource utilization. We identified patient risk factors for pacemaker insertion to enable development of a predictive model.
METHODS: Data were collected prospectively for 10,421 consecutive patients who had cardiac operations between January 1990 and December 1995. Two hundred fifty-five patients (2.4%) were identified as having received a permanent pacemaker during the same hospitalization. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent, multivariate predictors of permanent pacing. The predictive accuracy and precision of the logistic regression model was evaluated in the 1996 database of 2,236 consecutive patients by the calculation of Brier scores.
RESULTS: Eight independent predictors of permanent pacemaker requirement were identified. The factor-adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) associated with each predictor are as follows: (1) valve replacement surgery (aortic: OR 5.8, CI 3.9-8.7; mitral: OR 4.9, CI 3.1-7.8; tricuspid: OR 8.0, CI 5.5-11.9; double: OR 8.9, CI 5.5-14.6; and triple: OR 7.5, CI 2.9-19.3); (2) repeat operation: OR 2.4, CI 1.8-3.3; (3) age 75 years or older: OR 3.0, CI 2.0-4.4; (4) ablative arrhythmia operation: OR 4.2, CI 1.9-9.5; (5) mitral valve annular reconstruction: OR 2.4, CI 1.4-4.2; (6) use of cold blood cardioplegia: OR 2.0, CI 1.2-3.6; (7) preoperative renal failure: OR 1.6, CI 1.0-2.6; and (8) active endocarditis: OR 1.7, CI 0.9-3.0. A model for postoperative permanent pacemaker requirement using the eight predictors was formulated and tested (Brier score = 0.017+/-0.003; Z = 0.18).
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed predictive model correlated highly with actual pacemaker use, which suggests that the requirement for pacing results from either operative trauma or increased ischemic burden. Preoperative identification of patients at increased risk of conduction disturbances may allow for earlier detection and improved treatment. Patients requiring postoperative pacing had increased morbidity and length of stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9875774     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00889-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  18 in total

Review 1.  [Transcatheter aortic valve implantation : what do anesthetists need to know?].

Authors:  C Riediger; F Nietlispach; F Rüter; J Fassl
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  The bioprosthesis type and size influence the postoperative incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery.

Authors:  Maqsood Elahi; Khalid Usmaan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Unicuspid unicommissural aortic valve: an extremely rare congenital anomaly.

Authors:  Sukhjeet Singh; Puneet Ghayal; Atish Mathur; Margaret Mysliwiec; Constantinos Lovoulos; Pallavi Solanki; Marc Klapholz; James Maher
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2015-06-01

4.  Single- and dual-site ventricular pacing entirely through the coronary sinus for patients with prior tricuspid valve surgery.

Authors:  Chin C Lee; Khuyen Do; Sati Patel; Steven K Carlson; Tomas Konecny; Philip M Chang; Rahul N Doshi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation during the early postoperative period after valve surgery.

Authors:  Maqsood M Elahi; Darren Lee; Ramana Rao V Dhannapuneni
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2006

6.  Need for Permanent Pacemaker After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Reduces Long-Term Survival.

Authors:  J Hunter Mehaffey; Nathan S Haywood; Robert B Hawkins; John A Kern; Nicholas R Teman; Irving L Kron; Leora T Yarboro; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Ongoing requirement for pacing post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Alexander D Simms; Andrew J Hogarth; Elizabeth A Hudson; Victoria L Worsnop; Daniel J Blackman; David J O'Regan; Muzahir H Tayebjee
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-25

Review 8.  New conduction abnormalities after TAVI--frequency and causes.

Authors:  Robert M van der Boon; Rutger-Jan Nuis; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Luc Jordaens; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Ron T van Domburg; Patrick W Serruys; Robert H Anderson; Peter P T de Jaegere
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Risk factors for pacemaker implantation following aortic valve replacement: a single centre experience.

Authors:  G Limongelli; V Ducceschi; A D'Andrea; A Renzulli; B Sarubbi; M De Feo; F Cerasuolo; R Calabrò; M Cotrufo
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Predictors and frequency of conduction disturbances after open-heart surgery.

Authors:  Zahra Emkanjoo; Mansour Mirza-Ali; Abollfath Alizadeh; Saied Hosseini; Mohammad Vahid Jorat; Mohammad Hossein Nikoo; Mohammad Ali Sadr-Ameli
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2008-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.