Literature DB >> 9874924

Abuse against women in rural Minnesota.

M Kershner1, D Long, J E Anderson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of physical, emotional, and sexual abuse in women seeking care in rural medical clinics and WIC supplemental food program sites, as well as to examine demographic and health characteristics related to abuse. This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study using a self-administered, anonymous survey. Data were collected in 8 medical clinics and 17 WIC supplemental food program sites in 9 counties of west-central Minnesota during January and February, 1997. The survey instrument asked brief screening questions on physical, emotional, and sexual abuse as well as demographic and health related questions designed to reflect the rural population and characteristics. The survey results showed that in the prior 12 months, 109 (6.6%) of the respondents reported physical abuse, 347 (21.1%) reported emotional/verbal abuse, and 35 (2.1%) reported sexual abuse. Proportional increases in risk of current abuse relative to married women were 2.1 for single, 2.5 for divorced, and 6.5 for separated women, after adjusting for other important variables. Single women with a recent status change had significantly higher risk of current abuse than women with a recent status change at all other marital status levels in adjusted analyses. Women who reported some form of abuse before age 18, and women reporting abuse as an adult prior to the last 12 months, were significantly more likely to report current abuse in all analyses. Prior abuse as an adult was the single best predictor of current abuse in a final logistic regression model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9874924     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.1998.tb00369.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nurs        ISSN: 0737-1209            Impact factor:   1.462


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of abuse experiences of rural and urban African American women during perinatal period.

Authors:  Shreya Bhandari; Linda F C Bullock; Jeanita W Richardson; Pamela Kimeto; Jacquelyn C Campbell; Phyllis W Sharps
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2014-10-13

2.  A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence.

Authors:  Deborah M Capaldi; Naomi B Knoble; Joann Wu Shortt; Hyoun K Kim
Journal:  Partner Abuse       Date:  2012-04

Review 3.  Screening children for family violence: a review of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Peggy Nygren; Heidi D Nelson; Jonathan Klein
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Socioeconomic disparities in intimate partner violence against Native American women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Lorraine Halinka Malcoe; Bonnie M Duran; Juliann M Montgomery
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 8.775

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.