Literature DB >> 9874521

The influence of rate of temperature change and peak stimulus duration on pain intensity and quality.

J Nielsen1, L Arendt-Nielsen.   

Abstract

An important aspect of experimental pain research is that the assessment methods can investigate the different aspects of pain perception. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of rate of temperature change and peak stimulus duration on heat evoked pain intensity and quality. All stimuli were applied within the medial aspect of the anterior forearm. The rate of temperature change was varied from 1 to 16 degrees C/s without any effect on the pain threshold. The pain threshold decreased with an increasing peak stimulus duration from 0.1 to 2 s, but not from 2 to 3 s. The pain intensity for suprathreshold stimuli (46 degrees C, 48 degrees C, 50 degrees C) increased for decreasing rates and increasing duration. The pain intensity was highly correlated with the energy of the stimulus. When the rates of temperature change (1-16 degrees C/s) are varied, no differences between pricking and burning pain were present at either low stimulus intensity (46 degrees C) or high stimulus intensity (50 degrees C). At low stimulus intensity (46 degrees C), the pricking pain was not influenced by the duration (0.1-3 s), but the burning pain was intensified when the duration was increased from 1.5 to 3 s. At high intensity stimuli (50 degrees C), the pricking pain intensified with an increased duration, whereas burning pain did not. The heat pain threshold is influenced by the peak stimulus duration, and not by the rate of temperature change. If suprathreshold stimuli are used, both the rate of temperature change and the peak stimulus duration can strongly affect the pain intensity and the pain quality. Therefore, the same stimulus modality can be used to assess the modulation of different pain intensities and of the pricking and burning pain qualities simply by varying the stimulus configuration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9874521     DOI: 10.1080/08990229870781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res        ISSN: 0899-0220            Impact factor:   1.111


  10 in total

1.  A novel modelling and experimental technique to predict and measure tissue temperature during CO2 laser stimuli for human pain studies.

Authors:  Mohammed Hamed Al-Saadi; V Nadeau; M R Dickinson
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Millimeter Wave Radiation Activates Leech Nociceptors via TRPV1-Like Receptor Sensitization.

Authors:  Sergii Romanenko; Alan R Harvey; Livia Hool; Shuting Fan; Vincent P Wallace
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Body regional heat pain thresholds using the method of limit and level: a comparative study.

Authors:  Sungjin Park; Sang-Hyun Roh; Joo-Young Lee
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  A modified Hargreaves' method for assessing threshold temperatures for heat nociception.

Authors:  Ratan K Banik; Rajiv A Kabadi
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  A novel 1726-nm laser system for safe and effective treatment of acne vulgaris.

Authors:  Matteo Giuseppe Scopelliti; Amogh Kothare; Michael Karavitis
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 2.555

6.  Relationships between the intensity and duration of Peltier heat stimulation and pain magnitude.

Authors:  Charles J Vierck; Andre P Mauderli; Joseph L Riley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Spatial temperature distribution in human hairy and glabrous skin after infrared CO2 laser radiation.

Authors:  Ken S Frahm; Ole K Andersen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Carsten D Mørch
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Sensitivity of quantitative sensory models to morphine analgesia in humans.

Authors:  Anne Estrup Olesen; Christina Brock; Eva Sverrisdóttir; Isabelle Myriam Larsen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Pain sensitivity does not differ between obese and healthy weight individuals.

Authors:  Nichole M Emerson; Hadas Nahman-Averbuch; James L Peugh; Robert C Coghill
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2021-08-03

10.  Slow temporal summation of pain for assessment of central pain sensitivity and clinical pain of fibromyalgia patients.

Authors:  Roland Staud; Elizabeth E Weyl; Joseph L Riley; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.