Literature DB >> 9872049

[Detection and evaluation of adverse drug reactions].

P A Thürmann1, K Schmitt.   

Abstract

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occur in about 5% of drug-treated patients. Hospital admissions are caused by ADRs in 5% of patients and roughly 2% of hospitalized patients will experience an ADR. The economic burden of ADRs can only be estimated. Type A reactions can be explained by the pharmacological action of the drugs, and are preventable in many cases. However, Type B reactions involving the immune system and/or idiosyncratic reactions occur rarely and most of them are not fully understood. Genotyping represents an elegant method to explain the presence of abnormal enzyme activities and allows prediction of adverse drug effects in individual cases. Typical time frames have been identified for the occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions, although definite causality assessment is often impeded due to the absence or unavailability of specific laboratory tests and the impossibility of rechallenge. Diagnosis of an ADR is often difficult due to comorbidity and polypharmacy, thus causality assessment is often divergent even between specialists. In Germany, ADRs are reported preferably to the manufacturer of the suspicious drug and then collected and evaluated at the Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, BfArM. However, total number and quality of reported ADRs could be improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9872049     DOI: 10.1007/bf03044884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)        ISSN: 0723-5003


  23 in total

1.  [Unwanted drug effects in clinical practice].

Authors:  J Schoenemann; K H Munter; S Enayati-Kashani
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1998-04-09       Impact factor: 0.628

2.  The immunological basis of adverse drug reactions. A report on a symposium held in Liverpool on 6th April 1988.

Authors:  B K Park; J W Coleman
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Adverse drug reactions: physicians' opinions versus a causality assessment method.

Authors:  G Miremont; F Haramburu; B Bégaud; J C Péré; J Dangoumau
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Identification of adverse reactions to new drugs. II--How were 18 important adverse reactions discovered and with what delays?

Authors:  G R Venning
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-01-22

5.  A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  C A Naranjo; U Busto; E M Sellers; P Sandor; I Ruiz; E A Roberts; E Janecek; C Domecq; D J Greenblatt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality.

Authors:  D C Classen; S L Pestotnik; R S Evans; J F Lloyd; J P Burke
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Immunopharmacology and adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  M J Rieder
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.126

8.  Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients.

Authors:  D C Classen; S L Pestotnik; R S Evans; J P Burke
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Risks of bleeding peptic ulcer associated with individual non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Authors:  M J Langman; J Weil; P Wainwright; D H Lawson; M D Rawlins; R F Logan; M Murphy; M P Vessey; D G Colin-Jones
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-04-30       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Valproic acid hepatic fatalities. III. U.S. experience since 1986.

Authors:  A E Bryant; F E Dreifuss
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Adverse drugs reactions: diagnosis and assessment].

Authors:  P A Thürmann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.011

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.