Literature DB >> 9871821

Telephone or face-to-face interviews?: a decision made on the basis of a pilot study.

K Wilson1, B Roe, L Wright.   

Abstract

De Vaus (1991) highlights five main considerations that may be key factors in decisions about whether to use telephone or face-to-face interviews for survey work: response rates, ability to produce representative samples, effects on interview schedule design, quality of responses and implementation problems. De Vaus' discussion of these five issues is outlined at the start of this article. The five issues are then applied to the experiences of researchers conducting a study on continence care. Description and discussion of pilot interviews, which explored both interview modes, are followed by a similar examination of the main study which employed telephone interviews. Ideas in this discussion are supported and challenged by reference to other publications on the subject of telephone and face-to-face interviews. The success of the decision to use telephone interviews in the main study is evaluated and recommendations are made.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9871821     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7489(98)00044-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  10 in total

1.  The effects of interval feedback on the self-efficacy of netball umpires.

Authors:  Alison J Mahoney; Tracey Devonport; Andrew M Lane
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Brief report: telephone administration of the autism diagnostic interview--revised: reliability and suitability for use in research.

Authors:  Jessica Ward-King; Ira L Cohen; Henderika Penning; Jeanette J A Holden
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2010-10

3.  Collecting data by telephone from low-income African Americans.

Authors:  Nancy T Artinian; Doris Denison; Cheryl K Nordstrom
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.257

4.  Experiences of predictive testing in young people at risk of Huntington's disease, familial cardiomyopathy or hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Rhona MacLeod; Anna Beach; Sasha Henriques; Jasmin Knopp; Katie Nelson; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Ethnic differences in reported smoking behaviors in face-to-face and telephone interviews.

Authors:  Orna Baron-Epel; Amalia Haviv-Messika; Manfred S Green; Dorit Nitzan Kalutzki
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Financial considerations in the conduct of multi-centre randomised controlled trials: evidence from a qualitative study.

Authors:  Claire Snowdon; Diana R Elbourne; Jo Garcia; Marion K Campbell; Vikki A Entwistle; David Francis; Adrian M Grant; Rosemary C Knight; Alison M McDonald; Ian Roberts
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Piloting a computer assisted telephone interview: the FUCHSIA Women's Study.

Authors:  Helen B Chin; Candice Y Johnson; Konny H Kim; Jessica H Knight; Ann C Mertens; Pamela J Mink; Regina M Simeone; Jill J Woodard; Penelope P Howards
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Perceptions of Home Telemonitoring Use Among Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Sara Lundell; Mari Modig; Åsa Holmner; Karin Wadell
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.773

9.  Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep and quality of life: a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Mariana Alvina Dos Santos; Ana Paula da Conceição; Renata Eloah de Lucena Ferretti-Rebustini; Marcia Aparecida Ciol; Margareth McLean Heithkemper; Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2018-11-14

10.  Non-response to a life course socioeconomic position indicator in surveillance: comparison of telephone and face-to-face modes.

Authors:  Catherine R Chittleborough; Anne W Taylor; Fran E Baum; Janet E Hiller
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.615

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.