| Literature DB >> 9871454 |
Abstract
A number of important experimental data do not support the widespread hypothesis that Na(+)-channels block is cerebroprotective, essentially because it reduces presynaptic glutamate release: (i) the inhibition of exocytosis by these compounds is not specific to glutamate; (ii) aspartate efflux produced by various stimuli was also reduced, but aspartate cannot be released by exocytosis because it is not concentrated within presynaptic vesicles; and (iii) glutamate accumulated extracellularly during ischaemic or traumatic insult to the CNS is mainly of cytosolic origin. As an alternative, we propose that use-dependent Na(+)-channel blockers enhance the resistance of nerve cells to insults, primarily by decreasing their energy demand, and that reduced efflux of glutamate and other compounds is a consequence of attenuated cellular stress.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1998 PMID: 9871454 DOI: 10.1007/bf01345255
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Amino Acids ISSN: 0939-4451 Impact factor: 3.520