Literature DB >> 9869984

A randomized comparison of fixed power and temperature monitoring during slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

S A Strickberger1, E G Daoud, R Weiss, K Brinkman, F Bogun, B P Knight, M Bahu, R Goyal, K C Man, F Morady.   

Abstract

Temperature monitoring may be helpful for ablation of accessory pathways, however its role in ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) using the slow pathway approach is unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to prospectively compare slow pathway ablation for AVNRT using fixed power or temperature monitoring. The study included 120 patients undergoing ablation for AVNRT. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either fixed power at 32 watts, or to temperature monitoring with a target temperature of 60 degrees C. The primary success rate was 72% in the fixed power group and 95% in the temperature monitoring group (p = 0.001). The ablation procedure duration (35 +/- 29 min vs 35 +/- 30 min; p = 0.9), fluoroscopic time (32 +/- 17 vs 35 +/- 19 min; p = 0.4), mean number of applications (10.2 +/- 8.1 vs 8.4 +/- 7.9; p = 0.2), and coagulum formation per application (0.2% vs 0.5%; p = 0.6) were statistically similar in the fixed power and temperature monitoring groups, respectively. The mean temperature (47.3 +/- 4.8 degrees C vs 48.6 +/- 3.8 degrees C; p < 0.01), and the temperature associated with junctional ectopy (48.2 +/- 3.8 degrees C vs 49.3 +/- 3.6 degrees C, p < 0.01) were less for the fixed power than the temperature monitoring group. In the temperature monitoring group, only 31% of applications achieved an electrode temperature of 60 degrees C. During follow up of 6.6 +/- 3.6 months there were two recurrences in the fixed power group and one in the temperature monitoring group (p = 1.0). In summary, power titration directed by temperature monitoring was associated with an improved primary procedural success rate. Applications of energy were associated with a temperature of approximately 50 degrees C with both techniques, suggesting that there is a low efficiency of heating in the posterior septum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9869984     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009733110281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  19 in total

1.  Diagnosis and cure of the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias during a single electrophysiologic test.

Authors:  H Calkins; J Sousa; R el-Atassi; S Rosenheck; M de Buitleir; W H Kou; A H Kadish; J J Langberg; F Morady
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-06-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Temperature and impedance monitoring during slow pathway ablation in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  S A Strickberger; A Zivin; E G Daoud; F Bogun; M Harvey; R Goyal; M Niebauer; K C Man; F Morady
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-04

3.  Selective radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Evidence for involvement of perinodal myocardium within the reentrant circuit.

Authors:  G N Kay; A E Epstein; S M Dailey; V J Plumb
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Randomized comparison of two techniques for titrating power during radiofrequency ablation of accessory pathways.

Authors:  S A Strickberger; R Weiss; B P Knight; M Bahu; F Bogun; K Brinkman; M Harvey; R Goyal; E Daoud; K C Man; F Morady
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-09

5.  Relation between impedance and temperature during radiofrequency ablation of accessory pathways.

Authors:  S A Strickberger; S Ravi; E Daoud; M Niebauer; K C Man; F Morady
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Randomized comparison of anatomic and electrogram mapping approaches to ablation of the slow pathway of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  S J Kalbfleisch; S A Strickberger; B Williamson; V R Vorperian; C Man; J D Hummel; J J Langberg; F Morady
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Selective transcatheter ablation of the fast and slow pathways using radiofrequency energy in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  M R Jazayeri; S L Hempe; J S Sra; A A Dhala; Z Blanck; S S Deshpande; B Avitall; D P Krum; C J Gilbert; M Akhtar
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Radiofrequency coagulation of ventricular myocardium: improved prediction of lesion size by monitoring catheter tip temperature.

Authors:  G Hindricks; W Haverkamp; H Gülker; U Rissel; T Budde; K D Richter; M Borggrefe; G Breithardt
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Analysis of junctional ectopy during radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  J H Jentzer; R Goyal; B D Williamson; K C Man; M Niebauer; E Daoud; S A Strickberger; J D Hummel; F Morady
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Junctional tachycardia: a useful marker during radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  R K Thakur; G J Klein; R Yee; H W Stites
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  2 in total

1.  Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000-08

2.  Importance of the relationship between sinus cycle length and junctional rhythm cycle length (occured during radiofrequency ablation) in predicting the successful modification of the slow pathway in Atrioventricular Nodal Re-entrant Tachycardias.

Authors:  Javier Jimenez-Candil; Jose Luis Morinigo; Claudio Ledesma; Victor Leon; Candido Martín-Luengo
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2008-08-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.