Literature DB >> 9869679

Adhesion formation is reduced after laparoscopic surgery.

C L Garrard1, R H Clements, L Nanney, J M Davidson, W O Richards.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adhesion formation after abdominal operations causes significant morbidity.
METHODS: Adhesion formation in pigs was compared after placement of prosthetic mesh during celiotomy (group 1), laparoscopy with large incision (group 2), and laparoscopy (group 3). After peritoneum was excised, polypropylene mesh was fixed to the abdominal wall, then to the opposite abdominal wall in the preperitoneal space followed by peritoneal closure. Adhesion area, grade, and vascularity were measured.
RESULTS: More adhesions (p < 0.02) covered intraperitoneal mesh (7.57 +/- 1.89 cm2) than covered reperitonealized mesh (2.16 +/- 1.13 cm2), and adhesion grade was significantly greater (p < 0.02). Adhesion areas were significantly greater in groups 1 and 2 than in group 3 (p = 0.001 and 0.03, respectively). Adhesion grade was significantly greater in groups 1 and 2 than in group 3 (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). Groups 1 and 2 had more vascular adhesions than group 3 (p < 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively)
CONCLUSIONS: A foreign body within the peritoneum stimulates more numerous and denser adhesions. Tissue trauma distant from the site of adhesions increases their formation. A major advantage of laparoscopic surgery is decreased adhesion formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9869679     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  53 in total

1.  A comparative study of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Polymeneas; T Theodosopoulos; A Stamatiadis; E Kourias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The influence of intraoperative complications on adhesion formation during laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy in an animal model.

Authors:  E M Gamal; P Metzger; G Szabó; E Bráth; K Petõ; A Oláh; J Kiss; I Furka; I Mikó
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of two composite meshes using two fixation devices in a porcine laparoscopic ventral hernia repair model.

Authors:  A J Duffy; N J Hogle; K M LaPerle; D L Fowler
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Resistance to adhesion formation: a comparative study of treated and untreated mesh products placed in the abdominal cavity.

Authors:  R Gonzalez; G T Rodeheaver; D L Moody; P A Foresman; B J Ramshaw
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 5.  Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery?

Authors:  C N Gutt; T Oniu; P Schemmer; A Mehrabi; M W Büchler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Prevention of peritoneal adhesions: a promising role for gene therapy.

Authors:  Hussein M Atta
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Fixation of mesh to the peritoneum using a fibrin glue: investigations with a biomechanical model and an experimental laparoscopic porcine model.

Authors:  C Schug-Pass; H Lippert; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Antecolic or Retrocolic Alimentary Limb in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass? A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fabio Rondelli; Walter Bugiantella; Matteo Desio; Maria Cristina Vedovati; Marcello Boni; Nicola Avenia; Adriano Guerra
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Laparoscopy for benign colorectal diseases.

Authors:  Thomas Shin; Janice F Rafferty
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

10.  Adhesion prevention in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study comparing three lightweight porous meshes recommended for intraperitoneal use.

Authors:  L D'Amore; F Ceci; S Mattia; M Fabbi; P Negro; F Gossetti
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.