Literature DB >> 9868650

Does in vitro susceptibility to rifabutin and ethambutol predict the response to treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex bacteremia with rifabutin, ethambutol, and clarithromycin? Canadian HIV Trials Network Protocol 010 Study Group.

S D Shafran1, J A Talbot, S Chomyc, E Davison, J Singer, P Phillips, I Salit, S L Walmsley, I W Fong, M J Gill, A R Rachlis, R G Lalonde.   

Abstract

The in vitro susceptibilities of baseline Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) blood isolates from 86 patients with AIDS who were treated with clarithromycin, ethambutol, and rifabutin were determined to examine whether these results predict bacteriologic response to treatment. No patient received prior prophylaxis with clarithromycin or azithromycin. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of clarithromycin for all isolates were < or = 2 micrograms/mL. The median MIC of rifabutin was between 0.25 and 0.5 microgram/mL, and all isolates were susceptible to < or = 2 micrograms of rifabutin/mL. The median MIC of ethambutol was 4 micrograms/mL, and the MIC90 was 8 micrograms/mL. There was no correlation between ethambutol susceptibility and subsequent bacteriologic clearance. At all time points through week 12, bacteriologic clearance occurred more frequently in patients with isolates for which MICs of rifabutin were lower, but this difference was statistically significant only at week 2. Susceptibility testing for baseline MAC isolates from AIDS patients not previously treated with clarithromycin or azithromycin does not appear to be useful in guiding therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9868650     DOI: 10.1086/515022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  4 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic issues in the treatment of mycobacterial infections.

Authors:  E Nuermberger; J Grosset
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-13       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clinical and Environmental Mycobacterium chimaera Isolates.

Authors:  Simone Mok; Margaret M Hannan; Lars Nölke; Patrick Stapleton; Niamh O'Sullivan; Philip Murphy; Anne Marie McLaughlin; Eleanor McNamara; Margaret M Fitzgibbon; Thomas R Rogers
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Antimycobacterial agents differ with respect to their bacteriostatic versus bactericidal activities in relation to time of exposure, mycobacterial growth phase, and their use in combination.

Authors:  Irma A J M Bakker-Woudenberg; Wim van Vianen; Dick van Soolingen; Henri A Verbrugh; Michiel A van Agtmael
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Multisite reproducibility of results obtained by two broth dilution methods for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium avium complex.

Authors:  Gail L Woods; Natalie Williams-Bouyer; Richard J Wallace; Barbara A Brown-Elliott; Frank G Witebsky; Patricia S Conville; Marianne Plaunt; Geraldine Hall; Priscilla Aralar; Clark Inderlied
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.948

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.