Literature DB >> 9867891

A hierarchical outcomes approach to test assessment.

W S Pearl1.   

Abstract

This report describes a hierarchical classification system for clinical endpoints in diagnostic technology assessment. The model requires classification of investigative outcomes into 1 of 6 categories, including technical efficacy, diagnostic accuracy efficacy, diagnostic thinking efficacy, therapeutic efficacy, clinical outcome efficacy, and societal efficacy. Evaluations at successive levels indicate a broader understanding of the test's value. The purpose of this classification system is to help readers of the medical literature consider various aspects of test performance, and to identify aspects of a test that require additional investigation. It is also designed to be used as a template for systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. In this review, examples from the medical literature are discussed to highlight important concepts from the hierarchy model and their relevance to emergency medicine.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9867891     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70421-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  5 in total

1.  Hot Off the Press: B-lines and Focused Lung Ultrasound to Diagnose Acute Heart Failure in Dyspneic Patients.

Authors:  Karalynn Otterness; William K Milne; Christopher R Carpenter
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  The Six-Item Screener and AD8 for the detection of cognitive impairment in geriatric emergency department patients.

Authors:  Christopher R Carpenter; Bobby DesPain; Travis N Keeling; Mansi Shah; Morgan Rothenberger
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  An assessment of the characteristics and quality of diagnostic accuracy studies for positron emission tomography conducted in Japan: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shuhei Nomura; Akinori Hisashige; Daisuke Yoneoka; Mikiko Kanda; Karin Miyamoto; Miwako Segawa; Erika Ota; Kenji Shibuya
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.138

4.  How much diagnostic safety can we afford, and how should we decide? A health economics perspective.

Authors:  David E Newman-Toker; Kathryn M McDonald; David O Meltzer
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 5.  Effectiveness of Practices to Support Appropriate Laboratory Test Utilization: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Rubinstein; Robert Hirsch; Kakali Bandyopadhyay; Bereneice Madison; Thomas Taylor; Anne Ranne; Millie Linville; Keri Donaldson; Felicitas Lacbawan; Nancy Cornish
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.493

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.