Literature DB >> 9867096

Significance of a preserved colon for parenteral energy requirements in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition.

P B Jeppesen1, P B Mortensen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonic digestion has been reported to salvage up to 3-4 MJ/day in short-bowel patients (approximately 50% of the daily requirements).
METHODS: A cross-sectional study of the parenteral support given to a total cohort of 73 patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in Denmark on 31 December 1995 was performed to evaluate the significance of a preserved colon for the prevalence of short-bowel patients in need of HPN and the requirements of energy given as HPN. The number of HPN patients with a substantial remnant colon (> or =50%) was compared with the number with no colonic function (0%) in subgroups of patients with remnant small bowels of <100 cm (group 1), 100-200 cm (group 2), and >200 cm (group 3). Patients with pseudo-obstruction (n = 8) and patients with <50% colon remaining (n = 11) were excluded from the analysis. The impact of a substantial preserved colonic function (> or =50%) on the parenteral energy requirements was evaluated in patients with comparable lengths of small bowel.
RESULTS: Twelve and 8 patients in group 1 had no colon and > or =50% colon in function, respectively, in contrast to patients in group 2, in which 21 had no colon in function and only 2 had >50% in function (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.028). In patients in group 1 the need for parenteral energy in percentage of basal energy expenditure (HPN/BEE%, mean +/- standard deviation) was 110 +/- 31% in patients with no colon and 59 +/- 31% in patients with a preserved colon (P = 0.001). In patients without a colon in groups 2 and 3 the HPN/BEE% was 58 +/- 45% and 33 +/- 47%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of a substantial colonic function (> or =50%) is rare in patients in need of HPN with >100 cm remnant small bowel and results in a reduction in the parenteral energy requirements of approximately 3 MJ/day (51% of BEE) in patients with <100 cm small bowel. These data reinforce the reports of the colon as an energy-salvaging organ (approximately 3-4 MJ/day), which makes HPN unnecessary in most patients in whom small-bowel length is sufficient (>100 cm) to absorb another 3-4 MJ/day.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9867096     DOI: 10.1080/00365529850172539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  8 in total

1.  Reconnection surgery in adult post-operative short bowel syndrome < 100 cm: is colonic continuity sufficient to achieve enteral autonomy without autologous gastrointestinal reconstruction? Report from a single center and systematic review of literature.

Authors:  A Lauro; R Cirocchi; N Cautero; A Dazzi; D Pironi; F M Di Matteo; A Santoro; L Pironi; A D Pinna
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

Review 2.  Animal models of gastrointestinal and liver diseases. Animal models of infant short bowel syndrome: translational relevance and challenges.

Authors:  Per T Sangild; Denise M Ney; David L Sigalet; Andreas Vegge; Douglas Burrin
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 3.  Controversy in Nutrition Recommendations for Short Bowel Syndrome: How Type of SBS Impacts Response.

Authors:  Kerstin Austin; Sara Bonnes; Harrison Daniel
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-12-05

4.  Impaired meal stimulated glucagon-like peptide 2 response in ileal resected short bowel patients with intestinal failure.

Authors:  P B Jeppesen; B Hartmann; B S Hansen; J Thulesen; J J Holst; P B Mortensen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  The management of patients with the short bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Cameron F E Platell; Jane Coster; Rosalie D McCauley; John C Hall
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Nutrient intake from habitual oral diet in patients with severe short bowel syndrome living in the southeastern United States.

Authors:  Concepción F Estívariz; Menghua Luo; Kayellen Umeakunne; Niloofar Bazargan; John R Galloway; Lorraine M Leader; Thomas R Ziegler
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.008

Review 7.  Parenteral Nutrition and Intestinal Failure.

Authors:  Barbara Bielawska; Johane P Allard
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 8.  Chronic intestinal failure and short bowel syndrome in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Aysegül Aksan; Karima Farrag; Irina Blumenstein; Oliver Schröder; Axel U Dignass; Jürgen Stein
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.