PURPOSE: The efficacy of the reduction time (tau) after castration as a prognostic factor was examined by comparing to Gleason score. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The change of prostatic volume after castration was observed from the castration to 3 months after in 24 cases of prostatic cancer. Prostatic volume was examined by transrectal ultrasonography of the prostate. Survival curves was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Differences among survival curves were analyzed using Cox-Mantel test. RESULTS: tau had a close relationship to the prognosis of each case (Wilcoxon test: p < 0.05, Cox-Mantel test: p < 0.05). Gleason score had a weak relationship to prognosis (Wilcoxon test: N. S., Cox-Mantel test: p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: tau was efficient as prognostic factor compared to Gleason score.
PURPOSE: The efficacy of the reduction time (tau) after castration as a prognostic factor was examined by comparing to Gleason score. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The change of prostatic volume after castration was observed from the castration to 3 months after in 24 cases of prostatic cancer. Prostatic volume was examined by transrectal ultrasonography of the prostate. Survival curves was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Differences among survival curves were analyzed using Cox-Mantel test. RESULTS: tau had a close relationship to the prognosis of each case (Wilcoxon test: p < 0.05, Cox-Mantel test: p < 0.05). Gleason score had a weak relationship to prognosis (Wilcoxon test: N. S., Cox-Mantel test: p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: tau was efficient as prognostic factor compared to Gleason score.