OBJECTIVE: The effective dissemination of scientific information and its adoption by clinicians is the desired outcome of research and the path towards evidence based clinical practice. However, the link between both ends, is not direct and not always attained. Many other determinants play decisive roles in clinical decision making. Their nature, relationship and relative importance are not well understood. DESIGN: We conducted a survey among primary care physicians to ascertain their perception on factors related to clinical decision making. The questionnaire was specifically developed and was administered in face to face interviews by trained interviewers. PARTICIPANTS: A multistage clustered sample of 800 physicians representative of all Spanish primary care physicians, was drawn out of Health Service Payroll lists. Frequencies and multivariate logistic regressions were performed using SUDAAN 7.0. RESULTS: Spanish physicians seem to pay special importance to organizational aspects, such as daily demand, administrative regulations or prescription costs. Expert opinion and textbooks appear as the principal source of information, systematic literature reviews are unknown for most physicians. Finally, the majority of them perceive the need for more education. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians perceive organizational limitations to their decision making process and are willing to improve their medical knowledge. Additionally, they may benefit from strategies towards the spread of evidence based medicine built on these results, such as using experts to effectively convey evidence based information, increasing opportunities for more education, or developing evidence based sources following textbooks advantages.
OBJECTIVE: The effective dissemination of scientific information and its adoption by clinicians is the desired outcome of research and the path towards evidence based clinical practice. However, the link between both ends, is not direct and not always attained. Many other determinants play decisive roles in clinical decision making. Their nature, relationship and relative importance are not well understood. DESIGN: We conducted a survey among primary care physicians to ascertain their perception on factors related to clinical decision making. The questionnaire was specifically developed and was administered in face to face interviews by trained interviewers. PARTICIPANTS: A multistage clustered sample of 800 physicians representative of all Spanish primary care physicians, was drawn out of Health Service Payroll lists. Frequencies and multivariate logistic regressions were performed using SUDAAN 7.0. RESULTS: Spanish physicians seem to pay special importance to organizational aspects, such as daily demand, administrative regulations or prescription costs. Expert opinion and textbooks appear as the principal source of information, systematic literature reviews are unknown for most physicians. Finally, the majority of them perceive the need for more education. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians perceive organizational limitations to their decision making process and are willing to improve their medical knowledge. Additionally, they may benefit from strategies towards the spread of evidence based medicine built on these results, such as using experts to effectively convey evidence based information, increasing opportunities for more education, or developing evidence based sources following textbooks advantages.
Authors: María Carmen Sánchez López; Manuel Madrigal de Torres; Juan Antonio Sánchez Sánchez; Juan Francisco Menárguez Puche; Enrique Aguinaga Ontoso Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2010-02-04 Impact factor: 1.137