Literature DB >> 9866167

Methods for assessing the physical demands of manual lifting: a review and case study from warehousing.

T R Waters1, V Putz-Anderson, S Baron.   

Abstract

Assessment of the physical demands of potentially hazardous manual material handling (MMH) activities is fundamental to the prevention of disabilities from occupationally related low back pain, a problem costing the nation billions of dollars annually. Although there is a variety of ergonomic assessment methods available for assessing MMH activities, there is a lack of practical information to assist users in choosing the most appropriate assessment methods of a particular job. This article reviews currently available assessment methods and presents case study results of a physically demanding repetitive manual lifting job in two grocery warehouses. The case study will provide a framework for a comparison of the methods and a discussion of relevant application issues designed to assist users in selecting appropriate methods for assessing MMH jobs. Based on the results of the study, it is concluded that all of the ergonomic methods were in agreement that the job of grocery selector has a high level of risk for low back pain. Differences between the methods were noted, however, that should be considered when choosing a specific method for a specific application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9866167     DOI: 10.1080/15428119891011045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J        ISSN: 0002-8894


  7 in total

1.  Development of Human Posture Simulation Method for Assessing Posture Angles and Spinal Loads.

Authors:  Ming-Lun Lu; Thomas Waters; Dwight Werren
Journal:  Hum Factors Ergon Manuf       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.722

2.  Quantifying relationships between selected work-related risk factors and back pain: a systematic review of objective biomechanical measures and cost-related health outcomes.

Authors:  Nancy A Nelson; Richard E Hughes
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.656

Review 3.  Evaluation of the Impact of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation.

Authors:  Ming-Lun Lu; Vern Putz-Anderson; Arun Garg; Kermit G Davis
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  A pilot study to assess a risk of a high-risk group of low back pain membership in workers who perform the manual material handling tasks.

Authors:  Sungho Lee; Seongchan Heo; Jong-Young Lee
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2021-11-17

5.  Study protocol title: a prospective cohort study of low back pain.

Authors:  Arun Garg; Kurt T Hegmann; J Steven Moore; Jay Kapellusch; Matthew S Thiese; Sruthi Boda; Parag Bhoyr; Donald Bloswick; Andrew Merryweather; Richard Sesek; Gwen Deckow-Schaefer; James Foster; Eric Wood; Xiaoming Sheng; Richard Holubkov
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Variable Lifting Index (VLI): A New Method for Evaluating Variable Lifting Tasks.

Authors:  Thomas Waters; Enrico Occhipinti; Daniela Colombini; Enrique Alvarez-Casado; Robert Fox
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.888

7.  Measuring Effects of Two-Handed Side and Anterior Load Carriage on Thoracic-Pelvic Coordination Using Wearable Gyroscopes.

Authors:  Sol Lim; Clive D'Souza
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.