Literature DB >> 9863699

Long-term potentiation in the neocortex of the adult, freely moving rat.

C Trepel1, R J Racine.   

Abstract

Neocortical preparations have proven highly resistant to the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP), and we have only recently determined the conditions sufficient for the induction of neocortical LTP in the adult, freely moving rat. The stimulation trains must be spaced and repeated over a period of days in order to reach asymptotic levels of potentiation. Here we show that, within these constraints, the neocortex is actually highly responsive. LTP could be induced with as few as one brief high frequency train per day or with extremely low-intensity stimulation trains. We also provide evidence for a critical role for N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation in LTP induction in this preparation, and demonstrate that this LTP is input-specific. Control pathways showed no potentiation effects. LTP was found in a monosynaptic and two polysynaptic components (average latencies to peak: 8.1, 15.2 and 20.0 ms) and in the superimposed population spikes. Although LTP could be induced with one train per day or with low-intensity trains, larger and longer-lasting potentiation effects could be induced by increasing the number of trains delivered per session, the number of sessions over which trains were delivered, or the pulse intensity of the trains. The LTP decayed slowly and was still evident 5 weeks later. Administration of the competitive NMDA antagonist 3-[(+/-)-2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl]-propyl-1-phosphonic acid blocked the induction of LTP in a dose-dependent fashion and appeared to unmask a depression of both the population spikes and a polysynaptic component. These results indicate that the neocortex is highly sensitive to LTP induction procedures, as long as the stimulation trains are spaced and applied over a period of days. They are also consistent with the view that the neocortex must operate with a slow learning rate to reduce interference effects in memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9863699     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/8.8.719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  32 in total

1.  Long-term depression and depotentiation in the sensorimotor cortex of the freely moving rat.

Authors:  D J Froc; C A Chapman; C Trepel; R J Racine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  How long will long-term potentiation last?

Authors:  Wickliffe C Abraham
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Characteristics of the post-tetanic modification of synaptic transmission in the thalamocortical input of the somatosensory cortex in rats.

Authors:  A G Sukhov; T G Bezdudnaya; D S Medvedev
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-11

Review 4.  Memory processes during sleep: beyond the standard consolidation theory.

Authors:  Nikolai Axmacher; Andreas Draguhn; Christian E Elger; Juergen Fell
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 5.  GluA2-dependent AMPA receptor endocytosis and the decay of early and late long-term potentiation: possible mechanisms for forgetting of short- and long-term memories.

Authors:  Oliver Hardt; Karim Nader; Yu-Tian Wang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Long-term memory stabilized by noise-induced rehearsal.

Authors:  Yi Wei; Alexei A Koulakov
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Optical imaging of plastic changes induced by fear conditioning in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Yoshinori Ide; Takashi Miyazaki; Johan Lauwereyns; Guy Sandner; Minoru Tsukada; Takeshi Aihara
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Multiple sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation to the intact hemisphere improves visual function after unilateral ablation of visual cortex.

Authors:  R J Rushmore; C DeSimone; A Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Restoration of function after brain damage using a neural prosthesis.

Authors:  David J Guggenmos; Meysam Azin; Scott Barbay; Jonathan D Mahnken; Caleb Dunham; Pedram Mohseni; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Rewiring neural interactions by micro-stimulation.

Authors:  James M Rebesco; Ian H Stevenson; Konrad P Körding; Sara A Solla; Lee E Miller
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.