Literature DB >> 9863420

Adhesive bonding of fragmented anterior teeth.

B Farik1, E C Munksgaard, S Kreiborg, J O Andreasen.   

Abstract

This in vitro study investigated the fracture strengths of fractured incisors after reattachment to the remaining tooth structure, using either Gluma dentin-bonding agent together with 1 of 13 different experimental resins or 1 of the following dentin-bonding agents: Gluma+ (experimental modification of Gluma), Panavia21, ScotchBond1 (SingleBond), All-Bond2, Dentastic, SuperBond, Prime&Bond 2.1. No significant differences were found in the experiments with various experimental resins. The fracture strength of teeth rebonded with Gluma, All-Bond2, Dentastic, SuperBond or Prime&Bond 2.1 showed mean fracture strengths in the range of 8.7-11.2 MPa, which were significantly different in all cases from that of intact teeth (16.3 MPa). Teeth bonded with Gluma+, Panavia21 or ScotchBond1 (SingleBond) showed mean fracture strengths of 15.5, 14.6, and 14.2 MPa, respectively. These fracture strengths were not significantly different from that of intact teeth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9863420     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1998.tb00823.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endod Dent Traumatol        ISSN: 0109-2502


  3 in total

1.  Effect of storage environment on the bond strength of reattachment of crown fragments to fractured teeth.

Authors:  Farzaneh Shirani; Mohammad Reza Malekipour; Dana Tahririan; Vahid Sakhaei Manesh
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-07

2.  Influence of different bonding agents and composite resins on fracture resistance of reattached incisal tooth fragment.

Authors:  Ar Davari; M Sadeghi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2014-03

3.  Fracture Resistance of Reattached Hydrated Fragment of Fractured Incisors.

Authors:  Minu Suresh; Shanthala B Mallikarjun; George Babu; Madakkattayil Abdu Zareena
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.