Literature DB >> 9862920

Contribution of supragranular layers to sensory processing and plasticity in adult rat barrel cortex.

W Huang1, M Armstrong-James, V Rema, M E Diamond, F F Ebner.   

Abstract

Contribution of supragranular layers to sensory processing and plasticity in adult rat barrel cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 3261-3271, 1998. In mature rat primary somatic sensory cortical area (SI) barrel field cortex, the thalamic-recipient granular layer IV neurons project especially densely to layers I, II, III, and IV. A prior study showed that cells in the supragranular layers are the fastest to change their response properties to novel changes in sensory inputs. Here we examine the effect of removing supragranular circuitry on the responsiveness and synaptic plasticity of cells in the remaining layers. To remove the layer II + III (supragranular) neurons from the circuitry of barrel field cortex, N-methyl--aspartate (NMDA) was applied to the exposed dura over the barrel cortex, which destroys those neurons by excitotoxicity without detectable damage to blood vessels or axons of passage. Fifteen days after NMDA treatment, the first responsive cells encountered were 400-430 micrometers below the pial surface. In separate cases triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC), a vital dye taken up by living cells, was absent from the lesion area. Cytochrome oxidase (CO) activity was absent in the first few tangential sections through the barrel field in all cases before arriving at the CO-dense barrel domains. These findings indicate that the lesions were quite consistent from animal to animal. Controls consisted of applying vehicle without NMDA under similar conditions. Responses of D2 barrel cells were assessed for spontaneous activity and level of response to stimulation of the principal D2 whisker and four surround whiskers D1, D3, C2, and E2. In two additional groups of animals treated in the same way, sensory plasticity was assessed by trimming all whiskers except D2 and either D1 or D3 (called Dpaired) for 7 days before recording cortical responses. Such whisker pairing normally potentiates D2 barrel cell responses to stimulation of the two intact whiskers (D2 + Dpaired). After NMDA lesions, cortical cells still responded to all whiskers tested. Cells in lesioned cortex showed reduced response amplitude compared with sham-operated controls to all D-row whiskers. In-arc surround whisker (C2 or E2) responses were normal. Spontaneous activity did not change significantly in any remaining layer at the time tested. Modal latencies to stimulation of principal D2 or surround D1 or D3 whiskers showed no significant change after lesioning. These findings indicate that there is a reasonable preservation of the response properties of layer IV, V, VI neurons after removal of layer II-III neurons in this way. Whisker pairing plasticity in layer IV-VI D2 barrel column neurons occurred in both lesioned and sham animals but was reduced significantly in lesioned animals compared with controls. The response bias generated by whisker trimming (Dpaired/Dcut + Dpaired ratio) was less pronounced in NMDA-lesioned than sham-lesioned animals. Proportionately fewer neurons in layer IV (52 vs. 64%) and in the infragranular layers (55 vs. 68%) exhibited a clear response bias to paired whiskers. We conclude that receptive-field plasticity can occur in layers IV-VI of barrel cortex in the absence of the supragranular layer circuitry. However, layer I-III circuitry does play a role in normal receptive-field generation and is required for the full expression of whisker pairing plasticity in granular and infragranular layer cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9862920     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.3261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  Thalamic-evoked synaptic interactions in barrel cortex revealed by optical imaging.

Authors:  N Laaris; G C Carlson; A Keller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Functional independence of layer IV barrels.

Authors:  Nora Laaris; Asaf Keller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Neural activity: sculptor of 'barrels' in the neocortex.

Authors:  R S Erzurumlu; P C Kind
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 4.  Somatosensory cortical plasticity: recruiting silenced barrels by active whiskers.

Authors:  Reha S Erzurumlu
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.330

5.  Monosynaptic connections between pairs of spiny stellate cells in layer 4 and pyramidal cells in layer 5A indicate that lemniscal and paralemniscal afferent pathways converge in the infragranular somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Dirk Feldmeyer; Arnd Roth; Bert Sakmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Postnatal development of synaptic transmission in local networks of L5A pyramidal neurons in rat somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Andreas Frick; Dirk Feldmeyer; Bert Sakmann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Optical imaging of plastic changes induced by fear conditioning in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Yoshinori Ide; Takashi Miyazaki; Johan Lauwereyns; Guy Sandner; Minoru Tsukada; Takeshi Aihara
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Regulation of cpg15 expression during single whisker experience in the barrel cortex of adult mice.

Authors:  Corey Harwell; Barry Burbach; Karel Svoboda; Elly Nedivi
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  2005-10

9.  Spike timing-dependent synaptic depression in the in vivo barrel cortex of the rat.

Authors:  Vincent Jacob; Daniel J Brasier; Irina Erchova; Dan Feldman; Daniel E Shulz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Sub- and suprathreshold receptive field properties of pyramidal neurones in layers 5A and 5B of rat somatosensory barrel cortex.

Authors:  Ian D Manns; Bert Sakmann; Michael Brecht
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.