Literature DB >> 9862325

Interhemispheric connections of somatosensory cortex in the flying fox.

L Krubitzer1, J C Clarey, R Tweedale, M B Calford.   

Abstract

The interhemispheric connections of somatosensory cortex in the gray-headed flying fox (Pteropus poliocephalus) were examined. Injections of anatomical tracers were placed into five electrophysiologically identified somatosensory areas: the primary somatosensory area (SI or area 3b), the anterior parietal areas 3a and 1/2, and the lateral somatosensory areas SII (the secondary somatosensory area) and PV (pairetal ventral area). In two animals, the hemisphere opposite to that containing the injection sites was explored electrophysiologically to allow the details of the topography of interconnections to be assessed. Examination of the areal distribution of labeled cell bodies and/or axon terminals in cortex sectioned tangential to the pial surface revealed several consistent findings. First, the density of connections varied as a function of the body part representation injected. For example, the area 3b representation of the trunk and structures of the face are more densely interconnected than the representation of distal body parts (e.g., digit 1, D1). Second, callosal connections appear to be both matched and mismatched to the body part representations injected in the opposite hemisphere. For example, an injection of retrograde tracer into the trunk representation of area 3b revealed connections from the trunk representation in the opposite hemisphere, as well as from shoulder and forelimb/wing representations. Third, the same body part is differentially connected in different fields via the corpus callosum. For example, the D1 representation in area 3b in one hemisphere had no connections with the area 3b D1 representation in the opposite hemisphere, whereas the D1 representation in area 1/2 had relatively dense reciprocal connections with area 1/2 in the opposite hemisphere. Finally, there are callosal projections to fields other than the homotopic, contralateral field. For example, the D1 representation in area 1/2 projects to contralateral area 1/2, and also to area 3b and SII.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9862325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  13 in total

1.  Diffuse optical tomography of pain and tactile stimulation: activation in cortical sensory and emotional systems.

Authors:  L Becerra; W Harris; D Joseph; T Huppert; D A Boas; D Borsook
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Functional lateralization of face, hand, and trunk representation in anatomically defined human somatosensory areas.

Authors:  S B Eickhoff; C Grefkes; G R Fink; K Zilles
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  The functional organization and cortical connections of motor cortex in squirrels.

Authors:  Dylan F Cooke; Jeffrey Padberg; Tony Zahner; Leah Krubitzer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Clinical effects and brain metabolic correlates in non-invasive cortical neuromodulation for visceral pain.

Authors:  Felipe Fregni; Kimberly Potvin; Deborah Dasilva; Xiaoen Wang; Robert E Lenkinski; Steven D Freedman; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 3.931

5.  Coevolution of motor cortex and behavioral specializations associated with flight and echolocation in bats.

Authors:  Andrew C Halley; Mary K L Baldwin; Dylan F Cooke; Mackenzie Englund; Carlos R Pineda; Tobias Schmid; Michael M Yartsev; Leah Krubitzer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 10.900

6.  Phantoms on the hands: Influence of the body on brief synchiric visual percepts.

Authors:  Jared Medina; Daniel E Drebing; Roy H Hamilton; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Thalamocortical connections of parietal somatosensory cortical fields in macaque monkeys are highly divergent and convergent.

Authors:  Jeffrey Padberg; Christina Cerkevich; James Engle; Alexander T Rajan; Gregg Recanzone; Jon Kaas; Leah Krubitzer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Phantom tactile sensations modulated by body position.

Authors:  Jared Medina; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  What are the Effects of Severe Visual Impairment on the Cortical Organization and Connectivity of Primary Visual Cortex?

Authors:  Delaine D Larsen; Julie D Luu; Marie E Burns; Leah Krubitzer
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.856

Review 10.  Cortical plasticity within and across lifetimes: how can development inform us about phenotypic transformations?

Authors:  Leah Krubitzer; James C Dooley
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.