Literature DB >> 9862291

Electrodiagnostic studies: are they useful in clinical practice?

M J Kothari1, M A Blakeslee, R Reichwein, Z Simmons, E L Logigian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Electrodiagnostic testing (electromyography [EMG] and nerve conduction studies [NCS]) may result in some patient discomfort. The justification for such testing should be based on the expectation that the results will affect patient management. This study was conducted to determine how frequently the results of EMG/NCS change the clinical management of the patient.
METHODS: One investigator (MB) spoke to each referring physician after EMG/NCS to determine if any management decisions were altered by the test.
RESULTS: One hundred forty consecutive EMG/NCS records were obtained. Follow-up was available on 100 patients. Of 78 patients with abnormal findings on EMG/NCS, 29 (37%) had a diagnosis different from the referring diagnosis. For 43 of the 78 (55%), the physician reported that additional diagnostic testing was undertaken or treatment plans were altered.
CONCLUSION: EMG/NCS are useful, informative, and diagnostic in the management of various neurologic disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9862291     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90411-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  3 in total

1.  Electrodiagnostic tests are unlikely to change management in those with a known cause of typical distal symmetric polyneuropathy.

Authors:  Brian C Callaghan; James F Burke; Kevin A Kerber; James W Albers; Eva L Feldman
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Utilization of nerve conduction studies for the diagnosis of polyneuropathy in patients with diabetes: a retrospective analysis of a large patient series.

Authors:  Xuan Kong; Eugene A Lesser; Frisso A Potts; Shai N Gozani
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-03

3.  Requests of electrodiagnostic testing: consistency and agreement of referral diagnosis. What is changed in a primary outpatient EMG lab 16 years later?

Authors:  Mauro Mondelli; Alessandro Aretini; Giuseppe Greco
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.307

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.