Literature DB >> 9861921

When not to syringe an ear.

P Blake1, R Matthews, J Hornibrook.   

Abstract

This article reviews the potential hazards of ear syringing and the Accident Compensation Corporation Medical Misadventure Unit's experience of alleged iatrogenic injury over a 17-month period. Syringing claims account for about 25% of the total claims received by the ACC ENT Medical Misadventure Committee. Forty-seven claims were accepted as either mishap or error, and 63 claims were declined. Perforation of the drum was by far the commonest injury resulting in significant disability. Severe iatrogenic otitis externa accounted for most of the remainder. Practice nurses had syringed the ears of approximately two-thirds of the claimants with significant disability. The contraindications to ear syringing are listed and discussed. The correct technique, with a few "do and don't" pointers, is briefly reviewed. Management of the unintentional injury is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9861921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  4 in total

1.  Foreign bodies in the ear: a simple technique for removal analysed in vitro.

Authors:  S Kumar; M Kumar; T Lesser; G Banhegyi
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  [Complication rate of out-patient removal of ear wax: systematic review of the literature].

Authors:  G Schmiemann; C Kruschinski
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Randomized trial of bulb syringes for earwax: impact on health service utilization.

Authors:  Richard Coppin; Dorothy Wicke; Paul Little
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Managing earwax in primary care: efficacy of self-treatment using a bulb syringe.

Authors:  Richard Coppin; Dorothy Wicke; Paul Little
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.386

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.