PURPOSE:Twelve healthy men (26.4 yr) and women (26.8 yr) were compared at rest and after cycling for 25 min at 60 and 80% VO2max to determine whether gender and menstrual cycle influenced circulating beta-endorphin concentration (BE). METHODS:VO2max was determined on a cycle ergometer, and subjects completed the exercise in a randomized order. Women were tested in both the luteal (L) and follicular (F) phases of their menstrual cycle, which was confirmed by their blood estrogen levels. All tests were conducted in the morning after a 30-min rest (12-h postabsorptive). An indwelling venous catheter placed in a forearm vein enabled blood sampling at rest, 25 min of cycling, and 25 min of recovery. RESULTS:Resting BE was similar for men before both 60 and 80% intensities of exercise, 5.27 +/- 0.43 and 5.30 +/- 0.33 pmol.mL-1, respectively. BE was not significantly changed at 60% VO2max (6.54 +/- 0.33 pmol.mL-1) but significantly increased at 80% VO2max (11.90 +/- 1.98 pmol.mL-1). Women tended to have slightly lower BE during the L compared with F, but this did not reach significance (L = 4.40 +/- 0.22, F = 4.73 +/- 0.30 pmol.mL-1). Cycling at 60% VO2max did not significantly increase BE in the L (5.41 +/- 0.42 pmol.mL-1) nor the F (5.35 +/- 0.40 pmol.mL-1). Cycling at 80% VO2max increased BE to a similar extent in both the L and F phase, respectively (10.44 and 10.96). Although the BE concentrations tended to be slightly lower in women compared with men at 80% VO2max, this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that women cycling at 80% VO2max will have a similar BE response to men independent of their menstrual cycle. BE in women at rest and who exercise at lower exercise intensities may have slightly lower BE levels then men independent of the time of the women's menstrual cycle.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Twelve healthy men (26.4 yr) and women (26.8 yr) were compared at rest and after cycling for 25 min at 60 and 80% VO2max to determine whether gender and menstrual cycle influenced circulating beta-endorphin concentration (BE). METHODS: VO2max was determined on a cycle ergometer, and subjects completed the exercise in a randomized order. Women were tested in both the luteal (L) and follicular (F) phases of their menstrual cycle, which was confirmed by their blood estrogen levels. All tests were conducted in the morning after a 30-min rest (12-h postabsorptive). An indwelling venous catheter placed in a forearm vein enabled blood sampling at rest, 25 min of cycling, and 25 min of recovery. RESULTS: Resting BE was similar for men before both 60 and 80% intensities of exercise, 5.27 +/- 0.43 and 5.30 +/- 0.33 pmol.mL-1, respectively. BE was not significantly changed at 60% VO2max (6.54 +/- 0.33 pmol.mL-1) but significantly increased at 80% VO2max (11.90 +/- 1.98 pmol.mL-1). Women tended to have slightly lower BE during the L compared with F, but this did not reach significance (L = 4.40 +/- 0.22, F = 4.73 +/- 0.30 pmol.mL-1). Cycling at 60% VO2max did not significantly increase BE in the L (5.41 +/- 0.42 pmol.mL-1) nor the F (5.35 +/- 0.40 pmol.mL-1). Cycling at 80% VO2max increased BE to a similar extent in both the L and F phase, respectively (10.44 and 10.96). Although the BE concentrations tended to be slightly lower in women compared with men at 80% VO2max, this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that women cycling at 80% VO2max will have a similar BE response to men independent of their menstrual cycle. BE in women at rest and who exercise at lower exercise intensities may have slightly lower BE levels then men independent of the time of the women's menstrual cycle.
Authors: Michel Lucas; Rania Mekary; An Pan; Fariba Mirzaei; Eilis J O'Reilly; Walter C Willett; Karestan Koenen; Olivia I Okereke; Alberto Ascherio Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Rania A Mekary; Michel Lucas; An Pan; Olivia I Okereke; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu; Eric L Ding Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Tamás Bender; György Nagy; István Barna; Ildikó Tefner; Eva Kádas; Pál Géher Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2007-05-05 Impact factor: 3.346
Authors: Henning Boecker; Ahmed Othman; Sarah Mueckter; Lukas Scheef; Max Pensel; Marcel Daamen; Jakob Jankowski; Hh Schild; Tr Tölle; M Schreckenberger Journal: Open Access J Sports Med Date: 2010-09-06