Literature DB >> 9861515

The Health On the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Websites.

C Boyer1, M Selby, J R Scherrer, R D Appel.   

Abstract

Internet has become one of the most used communication media. This and the fact that no constraining information publishing policy exists have created an urgent need to control the quality of information circulating through this media. To this purpose, the Health On the Net Foundation has initiated the Code of Conduct (HONcode) for the health/medical domain. This initiative proposes guidelines to information providers, with the aim, on the one hand, of raising the quality of data available on the Net and, on the other hand, of helping to identify Internet sites that are maintained by qualified people and contain reliable data. The HONcode mainly includes the following ethical aspects: the author's credentials, the date of the last modification with respect to clinical documents, confidentiality of data, source data reference, funding and the advertising policy. This article presents the HONcode and its evolution since it was launched in 1996.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9861515     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-4825(98)00037-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  86 in total

1.  The low availability of metadata elements for evaluating the quality of medical information on the World Wide Web.

Authors:  J Shon; M A Musen
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  MedCERTAIN: quality management, certification and rating of health information on the Net.

Authors:  G Eysenbach; G Yihune; K Lampe; P Cross; D Brickley
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

3.  A metadata vocabulary for self- and third-party labeling of health web-sites: Health Information Disclosure, Description and Evaluation Language (HIDDEL).

Authors:  G Eysenbach; C Köhler; G Yihune; K Lampe; P Cross; D Brickley
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

4.  Developing and evaluating criteria to help reviewers of biomedical informatics manuscripts.

Authors:  Elske Ammenwerth; Astrid C Wolff; Petra Knaup; Hanno Ulmer; Stefan Skonetzki; Jan H van Bemmel; Alexa T McCray; Reinhold Haux; Casimir Kulikowski
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Smartphones in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Nawfal Al-Hadithy; Panagiotis D Gikas; Shafic Said Al-Nammari
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Blogging and Social Media for Mental Health Education and Advocacy: a Review for Psychiatrists.

Authors:  Holly S Peek; Misty Richards; Owen Muir; Steven Richard Chan; Michael Caton; Carlene MacMillan
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 7.  A Systematic Review and Qualitative Analysis to Determine Quality Indicators forHealth Professions Education Blogs and Podcasts.

Authors:  Quinten S Paterson; Brent Thoma; W Kenneth Milne; Michelle Lin; Teresa M Chan
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-12

8.  Can Patients Trust Online Health Information? A Meta-narrative Systematic Review Addressing the Quality of Health Information on the Internet.

Authors:  Lubna Daraz; Allison S Morrow; Oscar J Ponce; Bradley Beuschel; Magdoleen H Farah; Abdulrahman Katabi; Mouaz Alsawas; Abdul M Majzoub; Raed Benkhadra; Mohamed O Seisa; Jingyi Francess Ding; Larry Prokop; M Hassan Murad
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  [Anesthesia and World Wide Web 2.0. Instructions for use].

Authors:  K U Klein; S C Thal
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 10.  The internet's role in HPV vaccine education.

Authors:  Pooja R Patel; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.