Literature DB >> 9860902

Bioassay-directed fractionation and chemical identification of mutagens in bioremediated soils.

L R Brooks1, T J Hughes, L D Claxton, B Austern, R Brenner, F Kremer.   

Abstract

Soil from a Superfund site (Reilly Tar Site, St. Louis Park, Minnesota) contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from creosote was treated with several bioremediation technologies including bioslurry (BS), biopile (BP), compost (CMP), and land treatment (LT). These treatment technologies are being evaluated in pilot scale laboratory systems by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Risk Management Research Laboratory in Cincinnati, Ohio. To evaluate the genotoxicity and identify the mutagens in the soil before and after the various treatments, fractionated extracts of five soils were bioassayed for mutagenic activity with a microsuspension modification of the Salmonella histidine reversion assay. Soils were extracted by sonication using dichloromethane (DCM). The five extracts were fractionated in triplicate (two for bioassay and one for chemical analysis) by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using hexane/DCM/methanol, and the fraction for bioassay were solvent-exchanged into dimethyl sulfoxide by nitrogen evaporation. Forty HPLC fractions for each sample were bioassayed in strain YG1041 with and without exogenous liver metabolic activation. As shown in a companion paper, the mutagenicity of two treatments (BS and BP) was significantly greater than the mutagenicity of the untreated soil. Mutagenic fractions (> 500 revertants) were analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). PAH analysis of the soils indicated that all treatments were effective in reducing the total PAH concentration (48-74%). Qualitative GC/MS analysis of the mutagenic fractions from the BS and BP treatments indicated that they contained azaarenes, which are mutagens. The CMP and LT processes were the most effective and least toxic bioremediation procedures based on mutagenic potency and chemical analysis. This research demonstrated that the combination of bioassays and chemical analysis provided a more accurate determination of toxicity in these complex environmental mixtures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9860902      PMCID: PMC1533455          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.98106s61435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  12 in total

1.  Genotoxic effects and chemical compositions of four creosotes.

Authors:  L Nylund; P Heikkilä; M Hämeilä; L Pyy; K Linnainmaa; M Sorsa
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Cytotoxicity and effect on mutagenicity of buffers in a microsuspension assay.

Authors:  D M DeMarini; M M Dallas; J Lewtas
Journal:  Teratog Carcinog Mutagen       Date:  1989

3.  Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test.

Authors:  D M Maron; B N Ames
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Bacterial mutagenicity and carcinogenic potential of some azapyrene derivatives.

Authors:  M J Tanga; R M Miao; E J Reist
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Specificity and sensitivity of Salmonella typhimurium YG1041 and YG1042 strains possessing elevated levels of both nitroreductase and acetyltransferase activity.

Authors:  Y Hagiwara; M Watanabe; Y Oda; T Sofuni; T Nohmi
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in mutagenic adsorbates to a copper-phthalocyanine derivative recovered from municipal river water.

Authors:  Y Sayato; K Nakamuro; H Ueno; R Goto
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 7.  Pollutant degradation by white rot fungi.

Authors:  D P Barr; S D Aust
Journal:  Rev Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 7.563

8.  Characterization of genotoxic components in sediments by mass spectrometric techniques combined with Salmonella/microsome test.

Authors:  M Grifoll; A M Solanas; J M Bayona
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 9.  Mutagenicity and genotoxicity of nitroarenes. All nitro-containing chemicals were not created equal.

Authors:  H S Rosenkranz; R Mermelstein
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Genotoxicity of bioremediated soils from the Reilly Tar site, St. Louis Park, Minnesota.

Authors:  T J Hughes; L D Claxton; L Brooks; S Warren; R Brenner; F Kremer
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Stress-induced evolution and the biosafety of genetically modified microorganisms released into the environment.

Authors:  V V Velkov
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Ketone and quinone-substituted polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in mussel tissue, sediment, urban dust, and diesel particulate matrices.

Authors:  Julie A Layshock; Glenn Wilson; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Aerobic Bioremediation of PAH Contaminated Soil Results in Increased Genotoxicity and Developmental Toxicity.

Authors:  Leah Chibwe; Mitra C Geier; Jun Nakamura; Robert L Tanguay; Michael D Aitken; Staci L Massey Simonich
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Recent Advances in the Study of the Remediation of Polycyclic Aromatic Compound (PAC)-Contaminated Soils: Transformation Products, Toxicity, and Bioavailability Analyses.

Authors:  Ivan A Titaley; Staci L Massey Simonich; Maria Larsson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2020-10-12

5.  Integrated Framework for Identifying Toxic Transformation Products in Complex Environmental Mixtures.

Authors:  Leah Chibwe; Ivan A Titaley; Eunha Hoh; Staci L Massey Simonich
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2017-01-04

6.  Bioassay-directed analysis-based identification of relevant pyrrolizidine alkaloids.

Authors:  Jochem Louisse; Patrick P J Mulder; Arjen Gerssen; Geert Stoopen; Deborah Rijkers; Milou G M van de Schans; Ad A C M Peijnenburg
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.168

7.  AhR agonist and genotoxicant bioavailability in a PAH-contaminated soil undergoing biological treatment.

Authors:  Erika Andersson; Anna Rotander; Thomas von Kronhelm; Anna Berggren; Per Ivarsson; Henner Hollert; Magnus Engwall
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 8.  The Salmonella mutagenicity assay: the stethoscope of genetic toxicology for the 21st century.

Authors:  Larry D Claxton; Gisela de A Umbuzeiro; David M DeMarini
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Mutagenicity of an aged gasworks soil during bioslurry treatment.

Authors:  Christine L Lemieux; Krista D Lynes; Paul A White; Staffan Lundstedt; Lars Oberg; Iain B Lambert
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.216

10.  Synergistic Cytotoxic Stress and DNA Damage in Clover (Trifolium repens) Exposed to Heavy Metal Soil from Automobile Refining Shops in Kashmir-Himalaya.

Authors:  Towseef Mohsin Bhat; M Y K Ansari; Sana Choudhary; Rumana Aslam
Journal:  ISRN Toxicol       Date:  2012-01-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.