Literature DB >> 9859226

Novel and transgenic food crops: overview of scientific versus public perception.

N L Ruibal-Mendieta1, F A Lints.   

Abstract

Recombinant DNA technology offers opportunities to develop new products in many different fields, including agriculture and the agro-food area. Transgenic plants with improved agronomic traits currently grow in field trials and a few varieties have already reached the European market. By and large, new technologies raise both concerns and expectations and modern biotechnology is no exception. Indeed, a voluntary moratorium on experiments involving recombinant DNA molecules was called for in 1974. At the present time, although a majority of academic and industrial scientists agree that transgenic food crops pose no risk for the environment or human health, some others believe that certain applications of modern plant biotechnology are hazardous. In particular, deliberate releases of genetically modified plants are regarded as risky. There is also a disparity between expert and lay perception of r-DNA technology applications to food crops, which makes public information a difficult task. This paper aims at exposing these conflicting points of view on the agricultural applications of modern biotechnology. We also propose some recommendations pertaining to public information in Europe. It appears that consensus conferences might be a good approach to stimulate public information and public debate in Europe, although this approach has to be adapted to the cultural context of each country.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9859226     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008845323046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  12 in total

1.  The recombinant DNA controversy: twenty years later.

Authors:  Paul Berg; Maxine Singer
Journal:  Biotechnology (N Y)       Date:  1995-10

2.  Public concerns in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: risk, benefit, and ethics.

Authors:  Lynn J Frewer; Chaya Howard; Richard Shepherd
Journal:  Sci Technol Human Values       Date:  1997

Review 3.  Biotechnology and the American agricultural industry. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-03-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Position of the American Dietetic Association: biotechnology and the future of food.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1995-12

5.  Biotechnology and society: we scientists have responsibilities too.

Authors:  G E Gaull; R W Woo
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Ripen-on-command: in a society with ample food, why bother?

Authors:  M Mellon
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Who's who in European antibiotech. Taking a look at public interest and environmental groups that take a special interest in biotechnology.

Authors:  B Dixon
Journal:  Biotechnology (N Y)       Date:  1993-01

8.  What the public thinks about biotechnology.

Authors:  B Zechendorf
Journal:  Biotechnology (N Y)       Date:  1994-09

9.  Public information and the ethical responsibility of the industry.

Authors:  F Bieri
Journal:  Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994-09

10.  Plant biotechnology. Lay U.K. panel savors debate.

Authors:  C O'Brien
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-11-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.