BACKGROUND:Community-acquired non-complicated acute pyelonephritis (APN) is a frequent, occasionally serious infection (around 20% of the cases are bacteremic) that usually requires hospital admission. The third generation oral cephalosporins which are active against more than 95% of E. coli strains should allow the outpatient management of these patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the bacteriological and clinical efficacy of oral cefixime in comparison to amoxicilin plus netilcilin in the treatment of APN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients older than 18 years affected by APN were included in a fourteen month prospective study. According to a random numbers chart, the patients received cefixime (400 mg/24 h in a single daily dose for 12 days) or amoxicilin (1 g/8 h per os) plus netilmicin (4 mg/kg/24 h in a single intramuscular daily dose) during five days followed by 7 days of an oral treatment chosen according to the susceptibility pattern of isolated microorganism. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients received cefixime and 65 amoxicillin plus retilmicin. There were no significant differences between both groups of patients. Thirty-two patients presented bacteremia (25.4%). The mean (SD) eak and trough concentrations of netilmicin were 11.4 (2.8) mg/l and 0.38 (0.4) mg/l, respectively. Clinical response was favorable in 97% of patients treated with cefixime and in 98% of those treated with amoxicilin plus netilmicin (p = NS). The infection recurred in 10 out of 59 patients (16.9%) in the cefixime arm of the study and in 9 out of 64 patients (14%) treated with amoxicillin plus netilmicin (p = NS). Tolerance to the study drugs was good in both arms of the study, and renal function remained normal. CONCLUSION:Cefixime seems to be an acceptable alternative to the regimens containing an aminopenicillin and an aminoglycoside for the treatment of community-acquired non-complicated APN.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Community-acquired non-complicated acute pyelonephritis (APN) is a frequent, occasionally serious infection (around 20% of the cases are bacteremic) that usually requires hospital admission. The third generation oral cephalosporins which are active against more than 95% of E. coli strains should allow the outpatient management of these patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the bacteriological and clinical efficacy of oral cefixime in comparison to amoxicilin plus netilcilin in the treatment of APN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients older than 18 years affected by APN were included in a fourteen month prospective study. According to a random numbers chart, the patients received cefixime (400 mg/24 h in a single daily dose for 12 days) or amoxicilin (1 g/8 h per os) plus netilmicin (4 mg/kg/24 h in a single intramuscular daily dose) during five days followed by 7 days of an oral treatment chosen according to the susceptibility pattern of isolated microorganism. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients received cefixime and 65 amoxicillin plus retilmicin. There were no significant differences between both groups of patients. Thirty-two patients presented bacteremia (25.4%). The mean (SD) eak and trough concentrations of netilmicin were 11.4 (2.8) mg/l and 0.38 (0.4) mg/l, respectively. Clinical response was favorable in 97% of patients treated with cefixime and in 98% of those treated with amoxicilin plus netilmicin (p = NS). The infection recurred in 10 out of 59 patients (16.9%) in the cefixime arm of the study and in 9 out of 64 patients (14%) treated with amoxicillin plus netilmicin (p = NS). Tolerance to the study drugs was good in both arms of the study, and renal function remained normal. CONCLUSION:Cefixime seems to be an acceptable alternative to the regimens containing an aminopenicillin and an aminoglycoside for the treatment of community-acquired non-complicated APN.
Authors: Jesse D Sutton; Vanessa W Stevens; Nai-Chung N Chang; Karim Khader; Tristan T Timbrook; Emily S Spivak Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-10-01