Literature DB >> 9859043

[Safe and unsafe indications to the electrophysiological examination].

W Schoels1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1998        PMID： 9859043     DOI： 10.1007/bf03043411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herz        ISSN： 0340-9937            Impact factor:   1.443


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators.

Authors:  A J Moss; W J Hall; D S Cannom; J P Daubert; S L Higgins; H Klein; J H Levine; S Saksena; A L Waldo; D Wilber; M W Brown; M Heo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A comparison of electrophysiologic testing with Holter monitoring to predict antiarrhythmic-drug efficacy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring Investigators.

Authors:  J W Mason
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-08-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Predicting and preventing sudden death from cardiac causes.

Authors:  J K Gilman; S Jalal; G V Naccarelli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Electrophysiological testing and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Use and limitations in patients with coronary artery disease and impaired ventricular function.

Authors:  D J Wilber; B Olshansky; J F Moran; P J Scanlon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 29.690
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.