Literature DB >> 9856874

The involvement of two or more systems and the severity of associated anomalies significantly influence mortality in esophageal atresia.

H Saing1, G H Mya, W Cheng.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the influence of associated anomalies in babies born with esophageal atresia (EA).
METHODS: A retrospective review of the records of 41 consecutive cases of esophageal atresia managed over an 11-year period was undertaken.
RESULTS: A higher incidence of associated anomalies was seen in those babies with lower birth weights. Although all five (100%) babies with EA who weighed less than 1,800 g had associated anomalies, those who weighed 1,800 to 2,500 g and more than 2,500 g were associated with 67% (10 of 15) and 43% (9 of 21) anomalies, respectively. The most common system in which anomalies occurred was the cardiovascular system (37%) followed by gastrointestinal (24%), musculoskeletal (17%), genitourinary (7%), chromosomal (5%), and others (12%). All 17 (41%) babies with no associated anomalies survived. Four of the 10 babies who had two or more systems involvement died, whereas only one of 31 babies with less than two systems involvement died; the difference between these two groups was highly significant (Fisher's Exact test, P = .009). The overall mortality rate was 12%. Three of the deaths were associated with severe anomalies that were incompatible with life such as bilateral renal agenesis, trisomy 18, and complex cardiac anomalies.
CONCLUSION: The association of two or more system anomalies and the severity of associated anomalies influence mortality in esophageal atresia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9856874     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90588-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  8 in total

1.  Combined esophageal and duodenal atresia complicated with meconium peritonitis.

Authors:  M Hibi; T Shimotake; N Iwai
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Is routine use of transanastomotic tube justified in the repair of esophageal atresia?

Authors:  Sarath Kumar Narayanan; Arun Preeth Vazhiyodan; Prathap Somnath; Arun Mohanan
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 2.764

3.  Esophageal atresia: Factors influencing survival - Experience at an Indian tertiary centre.

Authors:  R K Tandon; Satendra Sharma; Shandip K Sinha; Kumar Abdul Rashid; Ravi Dube; S N Kureel; Ashish Wakhlu; J D Rawat
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-01

Review 4.  Advances in the treatment of oesophageal atresia over three decades: the 1970s and the 1990s.

Authors:  Jillian Orford; Daniel T Cass; Martin J Glasson
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Unusual clinical history of a male infant with Edwards syndrome.

Authors:  Andrea Surányi; Tamás Bitó; György Vajda; László Kaiser; Gábor Gáspár; Márta Katona; János Szabó; Attila Pál
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 3.201

6.  The management of combined oesophageal and duodenal atresia.

Authors:  S Dave; E C P Shi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-09-11       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Magnetic compression stricturoplasty in patients with severe stricture after simultaneous esophageal atresia and duodenal obstruction repair: A case report.

Authors:  Shiqi Liu; Ying Fang; Yi Lv; Jingru Zhao; Ruixue Luo; Ruogu Luo; Jun Cheng; Hongbin Yang; Anpeng Zhang; Yingchun Shen; Na Jiang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Oesophageal atresia: Diagnosis and prognosis in Dakar, Senegal.

Authors:  Mbaye Fall; Papa Alassane Mbaye; Haingonirina Joelle Horace; Ibrahima Bocar Wellé; Faty Balla Lo; Mamadou Mour Traore; Marie Diop; Oumar Ndour; Gabriel Ngom
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.