Area and depth of surfactant-induced corneal injury predicts extent of subsequent ocular responses.

PURPOSE: To correlate area and depth of initial corneal injury induced by surfactants of differing type and irritant properties with corneal responses and outcome in the same animals over time by using in vivo confocal microscopy (CM).
METHODS: Six groups of six adult rabbits were treated with anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants that caused different levels of ocular irritation. Test materials included slight irritants: 5% sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), polyoxyethylene glycol monoalkyl ether (POE), and 5% 3-isotridecyloxypropyl-bis(polyoxyethylene) ammonium chloride (ITDOP); mild irritants: 5% 3-decyloxypropyl-bis(polyoxyethylene) amine (DOP) and sodium linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS); and a moderate irritant: a proprietary detergent (DTRGT). Ten microliters surfactant were directly applied to the cornea of one eye of each rabbit. Ten untreated rabbits served as control subjects. Area and depth of initial injury was determined by using in vivo CM to measure epithelial thickness, epithelial cell size, corneal thickness, and depth of stromal injury in four corneal regions at 3 hours and at day 1. Area and depth of corneal responses to injury were evaluated at various times from days 3 through 35 by macroscopic grading and quantitative confocal microscopy through-focusing (CMTF).
RESULTS: In vivo CM revealed corneal injury with slight irritants to be restricted to the epithelium, whereas the mild and moderate irritants caused complete epithelial cell loss with increasing anterior stromal damage: DOP < LAS < DTRGT. With the slight ocular irritants there was little or no change in corneal thickness or the CMTF intensity profiles. Three hours after treatment, mild and moderate ocular irritants caused a significant increase in corneal thickness, which peaked at day 1 with DOP (483.3+/-80.1 microm) and LAS (572.3+/-60.0 microm) and day 3 with DTRGT (601.4+/-68.7 microm); returning to normal (similar to control values) by day 7 with DOP and day 35 with LAS and DTRGT. The CMTF intensity profiles also showed significant elevation over that in the anterior stroma, which peaked at day 1 with DOP (14,608+/-4,306 U [U is defined as micrometers X pixel intensity]) and day 3 with LAS and DTRGT (18,471+/-6,581 U and 22,424+/-3,704 U, respectively) and returned toward normal by day 7 with DOP and day 14 with LAS and DTRGT. Elevated CMTF profiles principally reflected the presence of hyperreflective, punctate keratocytes and inflammatory cells at days 1 and 3 and the presence of activated keratocytes at day 7. There was a significant correlation between the elevated CMTF intensity profile and the corresponding macroscopic total score in each eye (r = 0.839; P < 0.001). More important, there was a significant correlation between area and depth of initial stromal injury measured at day 1, regardless of ocular irritant and the stromal response measured by the area under the CMTF intensity profile curve in each cornea (r = 0.87; P < 0.0005). A significant correlation between the area and depth of injury and the area under the corneal thickness curve was also observed in each cornea (r = 0.75; P < 0.0005).
CONCLUSIONS: In individual animals, the extent of initial stromal injury correlated with the magnitude of the corneal responses, measured by the change in corneal thickness and the CMTF depth intensity profile. These findings further support the hypothesis that area and depth of injury are the principal factors determining the early responses and eventual repair processes after accidental eye irritation. They also support the proposed use of area and depth of acute injury as a mechanistic correlate to ocular irritation in the development and validation of potential in vitro ocular irritation tests.