Literature DB >> 9856425

Minor head injury in children: current management practices of pediatricians, emergency physicians, and family physicians.

M E Aitken1, C T Herrerias, R Davis, H S Bell, J B Coombs, L C Kleinman, C J Homer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe variation in the clinical management of minor head trauma in children among primary care and emergency physicians.
DESIGN: A survey of pediatricians, family physicians, and emergency physicians drawn from a random sample of members of the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and the appropriate American Medical Association specialty listings, respectively. Physicians were given clinical vignettes describing children presenting with normal physical examination results after minor head trauma. Different clinical scenarios (brief loss of consciousness or seizures) were also presented. Information was gathered on initial and subsequent management steps most commonly used by the physician.
RESULTS: Surveys were returned by 765 (51%) of 1500 physicians. Of these, 303 (40%) were pediatricians, 269 (35%) family practitioners, and 193 (25%) emergency physicians. For minor head trauma without complications, observation at home was the most common initial physician management choice (n = 547, 72%). Observation in office or hospital was chosen by 81 physicians (11%). Head computed tomographic (CT) scan was chosen by 7 physicians (1%) and skull x-ray by 24 physicians (3%) as the first management option. Most physicians (n = 445, 80%) who initially chose observation at home would obtain a CT scan if the patient showed clinical deterioration. In the original scenario, if the patient had also sustained a loss of consciousness, 383 physicians (58%) altered management. Of these, 120 (18%) chose CT, 13 (2%) chose skull x-ray, 1 (1%) chose magnetic resonance imaging, 141 (21%) chose inpatient observation, and 125 (19%) chose a combination of CT scanning and observation. With seizures, 595 (90%) altered management, with 176 physicians (27%) choosing CT scan, 5 (1%) skull x-ray, 60 (9%) inpatient observation, and 299 (45%) a combination of radiological evaluation and observation.
CONCLUSIONS: Most physicians surveyed chose clinic or home observation for initial management of minor pediatric head trauma. Clinical management was more varied when patients had sustained either loss of consciousness or seizures. Further study of the appropriate management of minor head trauma in children is needed to guide physicians in their care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9856425     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.152.12.1176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  3 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric head trauma: the evidence regarding indications for emergent neuroimaging.

Authors:  Nathan Kuppermann
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-09-23

Review 2.  Interspecialty differences in the care of children with chronic or serious acute conditions: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michelle L Mayer; Asheley Cockrell Skinner; Gary L Freed
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Causes and consequences of injuries in children in Western Australia.

Authors:  Mallik V Angalakuditi; Nupur Angalakuditi
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-09-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.