| Literature DB >> 985625 |
Abstract
Unit activity was recorded extracellulary from neurons of the cat medulla following electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral and/or contralateral cannine tooth pulps. The majority of the cells (67%) were only responsive to ipsilateral stimulation. However, many (28%) responded to stimulation of either canine pulp and a few (5%) responsed to contralateral stimulation alone. The neurons were localized histologically in the necleus proprius of the rostral trigeminal nucleus caudalis (NVCaud) and in dorsal portions of the ventromedially contiguous lateral reticular formation (LRF). Cells exclusively responsive to ipsilateral stimuli had a relatively wide dorsoventral distribution. In contrast, 'bilateral' and 'contralateral' cells were situated only in the deep NVCaud-LRF border zone or in immediately adjacent portions of the LRF. Generally, ipsilateral stimuli evoked response bursts with shorter latencies, more spike potentials and briefer interspike intervals than equivalent contralateral stimuli. In experiments designed to study afferent interactions, a conditioning stimulus, applied to either the ipsilateral or the contralateral canine, preceded a test stimulus applied to the other canine at predetermined interstimulus intervals. Responses to the test stimulus were either totally or partially suppressed when intervals of moderate duration (90-500 msec) were used. However, responses to the test stimulus frequently were enhanced when the intervals were breif (less than or equal to 60 msec) or when the teeth were stimulated simultaneously. The results reveal that bilateral afferents from the pulps of the canine teeth converge upon neurons of bulbar trigeminal structures, that the neurons are differentially responsive to the activation of ipsilateral and contralateral pulpal receptors and that bilateral afferent barrages originating in the canine pulps interact to modulate the firing patterns of the neurons.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1976 PMID: 985625 DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90053-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Res ISSN: 0006-8993 Impact factor: 3.252