Literature DB >> 9855582

The risk of cystocele after sacrospinous ligament fixation.

S W Smilen1, J Saini, S J Wallach, R F Porges.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether sacrospinous ligament fixation independently increases the risk of anterior vaginal wall defect. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgical operations by a single surgeon from 1970 through 1997. Two groups were examined and divided into subgroups to evaluate the effects of exposure to sacrospinous ligament fixation: patients with anterior wall defects undergoing standard anterior colporrhaphy with (group 1A) or without (group 1B) concomitant sacrospinous ligament fixation, and patients without anterior wall defects undergoing other pelvic reconstructive procedures (but not anterior colporrhaphy) with (group 2A) or without (group 2B) sacrospinous ligament fixation. Recurrence rates were calculated for each group according to evidence of any degree of anatomic defect.
RESULTS: Among 322 patients in group 1, 9 of 77 in group 1A and 23 of 245 in group 1B (11.7% vs 9.4%, P >.05) had anterior wall recurrences. Among 73 patients in group 2, 8 of 45 in group 2A and 5 of 28 in group 2B (17.8% vs 17.9%, P >.05) had subsequent anterior wall defects.
CONCLUSION: The occurrence of anterior vaginal wall defects was not found to be altered by the performance of sacrospinous ligament fixation. These findings may be attributable to surgical technique emphasizing maintenance of anterior vaginal wall length during sacrospinous ligament fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9855582     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70041-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

Review 1.  Traditional native tissue versus mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature.

Authors:  E J Stanford; A Cassidenti; M D Moen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Avulsion of puborectalis muscle and other risk factors for cystocele recurrence: a 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Mirjam Weemhoff; Tineke F M Vergeldt; Kim Notten; Jan Serroyen; Paul H N M Kampschoer; Frans J M E Roumen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Renée J Detollenaere; Jan den Boon; Jelle Stekelenburg; Joanna IntHout; Mark E Vierhout; Kirsten B Kluivers; Hugo W F van Eijndhoven
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-07-23

4.  One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study.

Authors:  Viviane Dietz; Carl H van der Vaart; Yolanda van der Graaf; Peter Heintz; Steven E Schraffordt Koops
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Functional outcome after sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterine descensus.

Authors:  Viviane Dietz; Marieke Huisman; Joyce M de Jong; Peter M Heintz; Carl H van der Vaart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06

6.  Gynecologists' perspectives on two types of uterus-preserving surgical repair of uterine descent; sacrospinous hysteropexy versus modified Manchester.

Authors:  Rosa A Enklaar; Brigitte A B Essers; Leanne Ter Horst; Kirsten B Kluivers; Mirjam Weemhoff
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.894

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.