Literature DB >> 9855581

Teaching the pelvic organ prolapse quantitation system.

A Steele1, P Mallipeddi, J Welgoss, S Soled, N Kohli, M Karram.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the ease with which the new Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation system could be learned by residents and medical students. STUDY
DESIGN: Standardized multiple-choice tests were administered to 51 obstetric and gynecology residents and medical students from 4 community-based and university-based programs. Parallel pretests and posttests were administered in conjunction with a 17-minute video demonstration of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation system and with the addition of a visual memory aid. The posttest was repeated 3 months after the video presentation.
RESULTS: The use of a 17-minute video significantly enhanced participants' ability to interpret examination findings when expressed in the terminology of the system (mean improvement in scores 33%, P <.0001). Posttest scores were similar regardless of the type of program or exposure to urogynecology faculty. These scores were maintained at the 3-month retesting.
CONCLUSION: The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation system can be effectively taught by means of a public-domain video presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9855581     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70010-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Center-by-center results of a multicenter prospective trial to determine the inter-observer correlation of the simplified POP-Q in describing pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  N Lemos; J E Korte; M Iskander; R Freeman; A Arunkalaivanan; D Rizk; M Halaska; C Medina; J C Conceição; M Parekh; A Martan; O Sorinola; E Wlazlak; Gamal Ghoniem; S Swift
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The inter-system association between the simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (S-POP) and the standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) in describing pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Jittima Manonai; Lone Mouritsen; Paulo Palma; Oscar Contreras-Ortiz; Jeffrey E Korte; Steven Swift
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system.

Authors:  Steven Swift; Sarah Morris; Vikki McKinnie; Robert Freeman; Eckhard Petri; Richard J Scotti; Peter Dwyer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-04-06

4.  Validation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Index (POP-Q-I): a novel interpretation of the POP-Q system for optimization of POP research.

Authors:  Nucélio Luiz de Barros Moreira Lemos; Antonio Pedro Flores Auge; Jacqueline Leme Lunardelli; Silvia da Silva Carramão; Ana Luiza Antunes Faria; Tsutomu Aoki
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-01-24

Review 5.  Use of pelvic organ prolapse staging systems in published articles of selected specialized journals.

Authors:  Alejandro Daniel Treszezamsky; Lauren Rascoff; Azin Shahryarinejad; Michael D Vardy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Comparative study to evaluate the intersystem association and reliability between standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system and simplified pelvic organ prolapse scoring system.

Authors:  Nivedita Raizada; Pratima Mittal; Jyotsna Suri; Anurag Puri; Vivek Sharma
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-03-29

7.  A comparison of preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System.

Authors:  Mark E Vierhout; Jackie Stoutjesdijk; Johan Spruijt
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-07-29

8.  The FIGO assessment scoring system (FASS): a new holistic classification tool to assess women with pelvic floor dysfunction: validity and reliability.

Authors:  G Alessandro Digesu; Steven Swift; Federica Puccini; Jittima Manonai; Vik Khullar; Ruwan Fernando; Oscar Contreras Ortiz; Stefano Salvatore
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.894

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.