Literature DB >> 9855467

Defensive behaviors in wild and laboratory (Swiss) mice: the mouse defense test battery.

R J Blanchard1, M A Hebert, P F Ferrari, P Ferrari, P Palanza, R Figueira, D C Blanchard, S Parmigiani.   

Abstract

The development of laboratory rodent models for elicitation and measurement of a range of defensive behaviors raises the question of the relationship between defense in these animals and those of their wild congeners. To evaluate this relationship for mice, defensive responses to an anesthetized rat were compared for fourth-generation laboratory-bred wild mice and Swiss CD-1 (Swiss-Webster derived) laboratory mice in a Mouse Defense Test Battery. Wild mice showed enhanced levels of both freezing and flight, fleeing from distant approach of the predator in several situations and fleeing more quickly than the Swiss mice. However, Swiss mice did flee upon contact with the rat and also showed levels of several other defensive behaviors (risk assessment, defensive threat, and attack) that were often reliably higher than those of the wild mice. However, when wild mice were prevented from fleeing, their levels of defensive threat and attack were as high as, or at very short prey-predator distances higher than, those of the Swiss mice. These findings suggest that flight and freezing are the major defensive behaviors reduced in Swiss mice and that these reductions allow the appearance of higher levels of additional defensive behaviors in the laboratory animals. However, although Swiss mice do show lower levels of flight and freezing, their patterns of defensive behavior are sufficiently similar to those of wild mice that they provide adequate subjects for research on the biologic bases of defensive behavior. A final experiment indicated that when wild mice are familiarized with a chamber providing a place of concealment, they flee directly to this chamber on presentation of a rat, indicating that flight is a targeted response and not simply an abrupt increase in forward locomotion. Over 10 rat presentation trials with a blocked chamber entrance, however, this response declines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9855467     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(98)00012-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  28 in total

1.  Central infusion of ovine CRF (oCRF) potentiates defensive behaviors in CD-1 mice in the Mouse Defense Test Battery (MDTB).

Authors:  Mu Yang; Catherine Farrokhi; Amy Vasconcellos; Robert J Blanchard; D Caroline Blanchard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Amphetamine modifies ethanol intake of psychosocially stressed male rats.

Authors:  Larissa A Pohorecky; April Sweeny
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Rapid innate defensive responses of mice to looming visual stimuli.

Authors:  Melis Yilmaz; Markus Meister
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Collateral pathways from the ventromedial hypothalamus mediate defensive behaviors.

Authors:  Li Wang; Irene Z Chen; Dayu Lin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Oxytocin receptor antagonist reverses the blunting effect of pair bonding on fear learning in monogamous prairie voles.

Authors:  Yu Hirota; Aki Arai; Larry J Young; Yoji Osako; Kazunari Yuri; Shinichi Mitsui
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  Experimenter effects on behavioral test scores of eight inbred mouse strains under the influence of ethanol.

Authors:  Martin Bohlen; Erika R Hayes; Benjamin Bohlen; Jeremy D Bailoo; John C Crabbe; Douglas Wahlsten
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Behavior and pro-inflammatory cytokine variations among submissive and dominant mice engaged in aggressive encounters: moderation by corticosterone reactivity.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Audet; Emily N Mangano; Hymie Anisman
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Synaptic and behavioral interactions of oseltamivir (Tamiflu) with neurostimulants.

Authors:  Y Izumi; K Tokuda; Ka O'Dell; Cf Zorumski; T Narahashi
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Social features of scent-donor mice modulate scent marking of C57BL/6J recipient males.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Arakawa; Keiko Arakawa; D Caroline Blanchard; Robert J Blanchard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Systematic analysis of emotionality in consomic mouse strains established from C57BL/6J and wild-derived MSM/Ms.

Authors:  A Takahashi; A Nishi; A Ishii; T Shiroishi; T Koide
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 3.449

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.