A Jahn1, M Kowalewski, S S Kimatta. 1. Department of Tropical Hygiene and Public Health, Heidelberg University, Germany. Albrecht.Jahn@urz.uni-heidelberg.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether antenatal care achieves identification and timely referral of high-risk pregnancies in southern Tanzania. METHODS: We compared the risk profiles of pregnant women in general with those attending obstetric care and investigated the reasons for seeking care. The risk profile of inpatients was drawn up through interviews with maternity cases and analysis of their antenatal records at the regional referral hospital (n = 415); population-based data on the prevalence of specific risk factors were obtained from entries in antenatal care registers (n = 1630) and from literature. RESULTS: A significant risk selection towards obstetric referral level care was observed only for previous caesarean section (prevalence hospital 6.7%, all pregnancies 1.5%, P < 0.005) and for nulliparity (hospital 42.8%, all pregnancies 25.0%, P < 0.005). No significant differences were observed for other risk factors such as previous perinatal death, height < 150 cm, multiple gestation and breech presentation. Prevalence of the risk factors age > 34 years and grand multiparity was significantly lower among hospital users. Coverage of obstetric care was below 50% for all risk factors except previous caesarean section (91.5%). CONCLUSION: Despite pursuing the risk approach and very good coverage, antenatal care in Tanzania has only limited effect on extending obstetric care to high-risk mothers. A critical review of the present screening and counselling practices, including a more focused and client-centred application of risk assessment, is warranted.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether antenatal care achieves identification and timely referral of high-risk pregnancies in southern Tanzania. METHODS: We compared the risk profiles of pregnant women in general with those attending obstetric care and investigated the reasons for seeking care. The risk profile of inpatients was drawn up through interviews with maternity cases and analysis of their antenatal records at the regional referral hospital (n = 415); population-based data on the prevalence of specific risk factors were obtained from entries in antenatal care registers (n = 1630) and from literature. RESULTS: A significant risk selection towards obstetric referral level care was observed only for previous caesarean section (prevalence hospital 6.7%, all pregnancies 1.5%, P < 0.005) and for nulliparity (hospital 42.8%, all pregnancies 25.0%, P < 0.005). No significant differences were observed for other risk factors such as previous perinatal death, height < 150 cm, multiple gestation and breech presentation. Prevalence of the risk factors age > 34 years and grand multiparity was significantly lower among hospital users. Coverage of obstetric care was below 50% for all risk factors except previous caesarean section (91.5%). CONCLUSION: Despite pursuing the risk approach and very good coverage, antenatal care in Tanzania has only limited effect on extending obstetric care to high-risk mothers. A critical review of the present screening and counselling practices, including a more focused and client-centred application of risk assessment, is warranted.
Authors: Carol P Davy; Elisa Sicuri; Maria Ome; Ellie Lawrence-Wood; Peter Siba; Gordon Warvi; Ivo Mueller; Lesong Conteh Journal: Malar J Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: M L Abel Ntambue; K Françoise Malonga; Michèle Dramaix-Wilmet; Philippe Donnen Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Andrea B Pembe; Anders Carlstedt; David P Urassa; Gunilla Lindmark; Lennarth Nyström; Elisabeth Darj Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-12-03 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Blandina T Mmbaga; Rolv T Lie; Gibson S Kibiki; Raimos Olomi; Gunnar Kvåle; Anne K Daltveit Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2011-10-04 Impact factor: 3.007