OBJECTIVES: Recovery from focal motor pathway lesions may be associated with a functional reorganisation of cortical motor areas. Previous studies of the relation between structural brain damage and the functional consequences have employed MRI and CT, which provide limited structural information. The recent development of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) now provides quantitative measures of fibre tract integrity and orientation. The objective was to use DTI and functional MRI (fMRI) to determine the mechanisms underlying the excellent recovery found after a penetrating injury to the right capsular region. METHODS: DTI and fMRI were performed on the patient described; DTI was performed on five normal controls. RESULTS: The injury resulted in a left hemiplegia which resolved fully over several weeks. When studied 18 months later there was no pyramidal weakness, a mild hemidystonia, and sensory disturbance. fMRI activation maps showed contralateral primary and supplementary motor cortex activation during tapping of each hand; smaller ipsilateral primary motor areas were activated by the recovered hand only. DTI disclosed preserved structural integrity and orientation in the posterior capsular limb by contrast with the disrupted structure in the anterior limb on the injured side. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the main recovery mechanism was a preservation of the integrity and orientation of pyramidal tract fibres. The fMRI studies do not suggest substantial reorganisation of the motor cortex, although ipsilateral pathways may have contributed to the recovery. The initial deficit was probably due to reversible local factors including oedema and mass effect; permanent damage to fibre tracts in the anterior capsular limb may account for the persistent sensory deficit. This study shows for the first time the potential value of combining fMRI and DTI together to investigate mechanisms of recovery and persistent deficit in an individual patient.
OBJECTIVES: Recovery from focal motor pathway lesions may be associated with a functional reorganisation of cortical motor areas. Previous studies of the relation between structural brain damage and the functional consequences have employed MRI and CT, which provide limited structural information. The recent development of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) now provides quantitative measures of fibre tract integrity and orientation. The objective was to use DTI and functional MRI (fMRI) to determine the mechanisms underlying the excellent recovery found after a penetrating injury to the right capsular region. METHODS: DTI and fMRI were performed on the patient described; DTI was performed on five normal controls. RESULTS: The injury resulted in a left hemiplegia which resolved fully over several weeks. When studied 18 months later there was no pyramidal weakness, a mild hemidystonia, and sensory disturbance. fMRI activation maps showed contralateral primary and supplementary motor cortex activation during tapping of each hand; smaller ipsilateral primary motor areas were activated by the recovered hand only. DTI disclosed preserved structural integrity and orientation in the posterior capsular limb by contrast with the disrupted structure in the anterior limb on the injured side. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the main recovery mechanism was a preservation of the integrity and orientation of pyramidal tract fibres. The fMRI studies do not suggest substantial reorganisation of the motor cortex, although ipsilateral pathways may have contributed to the recovery. The initial deficit was probably due to reversible local factors including oedema and mass effect; permanent damage to fibre tracts in the anterior capsular limb may account for the persistent sensory deficit. This study shows for the first time the potential value of combining fMRI and DTI together to investigate mechanisms of recovery and persistent deficit in an individual patient.
Authors: K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; D A Chesler; I E Goldberg; R M Weisskoff; B P Poncelet; D N Kennedy; B E Hoppel; M S Cohen; R Turner Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1992-06-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M J Brammer; E T Bullmore; A Simmons; S C Williams; P M Grasby; R J Howard; P W Woodruff; S Rabe-Hesketh Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1997 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Derek Kenton Jones; Steve Charles Rees Williams; David Gasston; Mark Andrew Horsfield; Andrew Simmons; Robert Howard Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: F E Roux; K Boulanouar; D Ibarrola; M Tremoulet; F Chollet; I Berry Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Marek Kubicki; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Stephan E Maier; Hatsuho Mamata; Melissa Frumin; Hal Ersner-Hershfield; Ron Kikinis; Ferenc A Jolesz; Robert McCarley; Martha E Shenton Journal: Harv Rev Psychiatry Date: 2002 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: G Mochizuki; T Hoque; R Mraz; B J Macintosh; S J Graham; S E Black; W R Staines; W E McIlroy Journal: Brain Res Date: 2009-09-10 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Qian Jun Yap; Irvin Teh; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Min Yi Sum; Carissa Kuswanto; Kang Sim Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Mohamed L Seghier; François Lazeyras; Slava Zimine; Sonja Saudan-Frei; Avinoam B Safran; Petra S Huppi Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2005-09-26 Impact factor: 2.474