Literature DB >> 9853856

A 2-year comparative study of endometrial histology and cervical cytology of contraceptive implant users in Birmingham, UK.

L Mascarenhas1, A van Beek, H C Bennink, J Newton.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the endometrial histology and cervical cytology of users of two contraceptive implants releasing etonogestrel/3-keto-desogestrel (Implanon) and levonorgestrel (Norplant) in West Midlands (UK) users. A 2-year prospective randomized design was used to study 60 implant users. Endometrial histology and cervical cytology were compared before insertion and after 12 and 24 months. At the end of 12 months, the majority of samples were inactive/weakly proliferative in both groups. At the end of 24 months, this remained unchanged in the Implanon group whereas the pattern was more diverse in the Norplant group. Endometrial thickness was significantly reduced in both groups during treatment. Cervical cytology remained unchanged. It is concluded that, after 2 years, there was no evidence of an increasing risk of endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial carcinoma, cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia or cervical carcinoma in either of the two groups of implant users.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Cervical Effects; Cervix; Clinical Research; Comparative Studies; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents, Female--pharmacodynamics; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin--pharmacodynamics; Contraceptive Agents--pharmacodynamics; Contraceptive Implants--side effects; Contraceptive Methods--side effects; Cytologic Effects; Desogestrel--pharmacodynamics; Developed Countries; Endometrial Effects; Endometrium; Europe; Family Planning; Genitalia; Genitalia, Female; Histochemical Effects; Levonorgestrel--pharmacodynamics; Northern Europe; Physiology; Research Methodology; Research Report; Studies; United Kingdom; Urogenital System; Uterus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9853856     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  3 in total

Review 1.  Subdermal implantable contraceptives versus other forms of reversible contraceptives or other implants as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.

Authors:  J Power; R French; F Cowan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

Review 2.  Safety and Benefits of Contraceptives Implants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Morena Luigia Rocca; Anna Rita Palumbo; Federica Visconti; Costantino Di Carlo
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-08

3.  Retrospective Analysis of the Effectiveness and Reversibility of Long-Acting Contraception Etonogestrel (Implanon®) inCommon Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Sandra Roubos; Annet L Louwerse; Jan A M Langermans; Jaco Bakker
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.