Literature DB >> 9853725

Low postoperative infection rates with instrumented lumbar fusion.

S D Hodges1, S C Humphreys, J C Eck, L A Covington, N G Kurzynske.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown postoperative infection rates increase with the use of internal instrumentation. It is believed that longer operative times, prolonged retraction, instrumentation, and bone grafting lead to a higher risk of infection.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 126 consecutive instrumented lumbar fusions. All had bone graft. The infection rate was statistically compared with previously reported values.
RESULTS: Our infection rate (0.8%) was lower than the combined data from the literature (2.8%), though not significantly different. No significant differences were noted regarding patient or surgical factors.
CONCLUSIONS: This review showed that low rates of postoperative infection can be achieved despite patient or surgical factors. We believe that conforming to strict techniques, including copious irrigation and debridement, and having experienced operating room personnel and short operating times will reduce the incidence of postoperative infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9853725     DOI: 10.1097/00007611-199812000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  9 in total

Review 1.  Infections associated with spinal implants.

Authors:  Andrew Quaile
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparison of Serum CRP and Procalcitonin in Patients after Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Yeon Gu Chung; Yu Sam Won; Young Joon Kwon; Hyun Chul Shin; Chun Sik Choi; Joon-Sup Yeom
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-01-31

3.  How safe is minimally invasive pedicle screw placement for treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures?

Authors:  Timo Michael Heintel; Stefan Dannigkeit; Annabel Fenwick; Martin Cornelius Jordan; Hendrik Jansen; Fabian Gilbert; Rainer Meffert
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Which method is the most effective for preventing postoperative infection in spinal surgery?

Authors:  Erol Oksuz; Fatih Ersay Deniz; Ozgur Gunal; Ozgur Demir; Sener Barut; Fatma Markoc; Unal Erkorkmaz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effect of Using Local Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Addition to Intravenous Antibiotics in Posterior Lumbar Surgery: Midterm Result in a Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Gun-Ill Lee; Koang Hum Bak; Hyoung-Joon Chun; Kyu-Sun Choi
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2016-06-30

6.  Incidence, Impact, and Risk Factors for 30-Day Wound Complications Following Elective Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Nathan J Lee; John I Shin; Parth Kothari; Jun S Kim; Dante M Leven; Jeremy Steinberger; Javier Z Guzman; Branko Skovrlj; John M Caridi; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-20

Review 7.  Use of intrawound vancomycin powder against postoperative infection after spine surgery.

Authors:  Hiroshi Takahashi; Yasuaki Iida; Yuichirou Yokoyama; Keiji Hasegawa; Shintaro Tsuge; Katsunori Fukutake; Kazumasa Nakamura; Akihito Wada
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-01-27

8.  The degree of bacterial contamination while performing spine surgery.

Authors:  Dong Ki Ahn; Hoon Seok Park; Tae Woo Kim; Jong Hwa Yang; Kyung Hwan Boo; In Ja Kim; Hye Jin Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2013-03-06

Review 9.  Postoperative Spine Infections.

Authors:  Paolo Domenico Parchi; Gisberto Evangelisti; Lorenzo Andreani; Federico Girardi; Lebl Darren; Andrew Sama; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2015-09-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.