Literature DB >> 9851381

Cohort study on circumcision of newborn boys and subsequent risk of urinary-tract infection.

T To1, M Agha, P T Dick, W Feldman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A decrease in risk of urinary-tract infection is one of the most commonly given reasons for circumcision of newborn boys. Previous studies have reported rates of UTI to be 10-20 times higher in uncircumcised than in circumcised boys. This population-based cohort study followed neonates in Ontario, Canada, prospectively to study the relation between circumcision and subsequent UTI risk.
METHODS: Eligible boys were born to residents of Ontario between April 1, 1993, and March 31, 1994. We used hospital discharge data to follow up boys until March 31, 1996.
FINDINGS: Of 69,100 eligible boys, 30,105 (43.6%) were circumcised and 38,995 (56.4%) uncircumcised. 888 boys circumcised after the first month of life were excluded. 29,217 uncircumcised boys were matched to the remaining circumcised boys by date of birth. The 1-year probabilities of hospital admission for UTI were 1.88 per 1000 person-years of observation (83 cases up to end of follow-up) in the circumcised cohort and 7.02 per 1000 person-years (247 cases up to end of follow-up) in the uncircumcised cohort (p<0.0001). The estimated relative risk of admission for UTI by first-year follow-up indicated a significantly higher risk for uncircumcised boys than for circumcised boys (3.7 [2.8-4.9]). 195 circumcisions would be needed to prevent one hospital admission for UTI in the first year of life.
INTERPRETATION: Although our findings support the notion that circumcision may protect boys from UTI, the magnitude of this effect may be less than previously estimated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age Factors; Americas; Biology; Canada; Child; Child, Male; Cohort Analysis; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Diseases; Follow-up Studies; Infections; North America; Northern America; Physiology; Population; Population Characteristics; Research Methodology; Research Report; Risk Factors; Studies; Urogenital Effects; Urogenital System; Youth

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9851381     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)02392-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  24 in total

1.  Circumcision: a surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  J M Hutson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Visibility of the urethral meatus and risk of urinary tract infections in uncircumcised boys.

Authors:  Alexander Sasha Dubrovsky; Bethany J Foster; Roman Jednak; Elise Mok; David McGillivray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Topical hydrocortisone and physiotherapy for nonretractile physiologic phimosis in infants.

Authors:  Jung Won Lee; Su Jin Cho; Eun Ae Park; Seung Joo Lee
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 4.  Male circumcision and HIV prevention: ethical, medical and public health tradeoffs in low-income countries.

Authors:  Stuart Rennie; Adamson S Muula; Daniel Westreich
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Circumcision for all: the pro side.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Houle
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  [Clinical effectiveness of disposable circumcision suture in children: a prospective randomized controlled trial].

Authors:  Hui Xia; Hehua Wu; Kangyi Xue; Cheng Yang; Jiankun Yang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-07-30

7.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (abridged version).

Authors:  Sumit Dave; Kourosh Afshar; Luis H Braga; Peter Anderson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version).

Authors:  Sumit Dave; Kourosh Afshar; Luis H Braga; Peter Anderson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Topical steroid application versus circumcision in pediatric patients with phimosis: a prospective randomized placebo controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Ciro Esposito; Antonella Centonze; Francesca Alicchio; Antonio Savanelli; Alessandro Settimi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Circumcision: pros and cons.

Authors:  Berk Burgu; Ozgu Aydogdu; Semih Tangal; Tarkan Soygur
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.