Z C Lateva1, K C McGill. 1. Rehabilitation Research and Development Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, CA 94304-1200, USA. lateva@roses.stanford.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Both intramuscularly-recorded motor unit action potentials (MUAPs) and surface recorded MUAPs and compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) have slow afterwaves which can contribute as much as half their measured duration. This study tested the hypothesis that the slow afterwave has its physiological origin in the negative afterpotential of the muscle fiber intracellular action potential (IAP). METHODS: We investigated the slow afterwave in MUAPs and CMAPs from brachial biceps, tibialis anterior, first dorsal interosseous, thenar and hypothenar muscles in 15 normal subjects, and using computer simulations. RESULTS: The slow afterwaves did not match the time constant of the amplifier's high-pass filter, and so were not filtering artifacts. They lasted long after propagation had terminated at the muscle/tendon junction, and so were not due to the temporal or spatial dispersion of propagating single-fiber potentials. Their amplitude and polarity varied with the recording site as predicted by computer simulations that modeled the IAP as having a negative afterpotential. They also changed with double-pulse stimulation and decreasing temperature in ways consistent with the results of intracellular studies of the IAP negative afterpotential. CONCLUSIONS: The presented results support our hypothesis that the slow afterwave is a manifestation of the IAP negative afterpotential.
OBJECTIVE: Both intramuscularly-recorded motor unit action potentials (MUAPs) and surface recorded MUAPs and compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) have slow afterwaves which can contribute as much as half their measured duration. This study tested the hypothesis that the slow afterwave has its physiological origin in the negative afterpotential of the muscle fiber intracellular action potential (IAP). METHODS: We investigated the slow afterwave in MUAPs and CMAPs from brachial biceps, tibialis anterior, first dorsal interosseous, thenar and hypothenar muscles in 15 normal subjects, and using computer simulations. RESULTS: The slow afterwaves did not match the time constant of the amplifier's high-pass filter, and so were not filtering artifacts. They lasted long after propagation had terminated at the muscle/tendon junction, and so were not due to the temporal or spatial dispersion of propagating single-fiber potentials. Their amplitude and polarity varied with the recording site as predicted by computer simulations that modeled the IAP as having a negative afterpotential. They also changed with double-pulse stimulation and decreasing temperature in ways consistent with the results of intracellular studies of the IAP negative afterpotential. CONCLUSIONS: The presented results support our hypothesis that the slow afterwave is a manifestation of the IAP negative afterpotential.
Authors: Javier Rodriguez-Falces; Mikel Izquierdo; Miriam González-Izal; Nicolas Place Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2014-06-11 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Ignacio Rodríguez Carreño; Armando Malanda; Luis Gila Useros; Iñaki G Gurtubay; Javier Navallas; Javier Rodríguez-Falces Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 2.602