Literature DB >> 9851262

Early effective suppression of inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis reduces radiographic progression.

A A Stenger1, M A Van Leeuwen, P M Houtman, G A Bruyn, F Speerstra, B C Barendsen, E Velthuysen, M H van Rijswijk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of early 'aggressive' drug treatment on radiographic progression in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA), compared to conventional stepwise increasing intensity of treatment.
DESIGN: Prospective follow-up study with an experimental group and a historical control group both divided into a high-risk subgroup and a low-risk subgroup, based on prognostic factors. The effect of the 'aggressive' and the conventional treatment strategy was compared between both high-risk groups; the low-risk groups, both treated according to the conventional treatment strategy, were used to ensure internal consistency between the experimental and the historical groups. PATIENTS: A total of 228 consecutive patients with recent-onset RA (complaints < 1 yr at study entry).
METHODS: The 'aggressive' drug treatment consisted of institution of relatively fast-acting disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (sulphasalazine, methotrexate) immediately after diagnosis, and rapid adjustment of dosage and/or drug in the case of insufficient response as measured by a change in C-reactive protein (CRP) level. Radiographic damage was assessed according to a modified version of Sharp's method and cumulative disease activity expressed as CRP-area under the curve (CRP-AUC). The occurrence of side-effects was also evaluated.
RESULTS: After 2 yr of follow-up, comparison of the two high-risk subgroups showed the radiographic progression in the 'aggressively' treated subgroup to be significantly lower than that in the control group [Sharp score: median (range) 26 (0-100) vs 35 (1-188); P = 0.03]. Cumulative CRP values were also significantly lower than in the control high-risk subgroup [CRP-AUC: median (range) 1963 (212-8515) vs 3025 (46-15 632) mg.week/1; P = 0.002). This was achieved without an increase in the occurrence of side-effects. There was no difference between the two low-risk subgroups with regard to entry characteristics, CRP-AUC values or radiological progression, indicating comparability between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Early 'aggressive' drug treatment, using sulphasalazine and/or methotrexate, aimed at reduction of the CRP level, significantly reduces the (rate of) radiographic progression in RA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9851262     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.11.1157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0263-7103


  34 in total

Review 1.  Combination therapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  S Bingham; P Emery
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Interpreting radiographic data in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  P A Ory
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  The challenge of following process, damage, and function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical care.

Authors:  Josef S Smolen; Daniel Aletaha
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical care.

Authors:  J S Smolen; D Aletaha
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Modelling cost effectiveness and cost utility of sequential DMARD therapy including leflunomide for rheumatoid arthritis in Germany: II. The contribution of leflunomide to efficiency.

Authors:  Peter K Schädlich; Henning Zeidler; Angela Zink; Erika Gromnica-Ihle; Matthias Schneider; Christoph Straub; Josef G Brecht; Eduard Huppertz
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Trends in disease modifying antirheumatic drug prescription in early rheumatoid arthritis are influenced more by hospital setting than patient or disease characteristics.

Authors:  C Carli; A G C Ehlin; L Klareskog; S Lindblad; S M Montgomery
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Treatment strategy, disease activity, and outcome in four cohorts of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J M Albers; L Paimela; P Kurki; K B Eberhardt; P Emery; M A van 't Hof; F H Schreuder; M Leirisalo-Repo; P L van Riel
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Predictors of radiographic joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  L M Jansen; I E van der Horst-Bruinsma; D van Schaardenburg; P D Bezemer; B A Dijkmans
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Infliximab in active early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  F C Breedveld; P Emery; E Keystone; K Patel; D E Furst; J R Kalden; E W St Clair; M Weisman; J Smolen; P E Lipsky; R N Maini
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  K P Liao; K L Batra; L Chibnik; P H Schur; K H Costenbader
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.