Literature DB >> 9850997

Influence of pig age on virus titer and bactericidal activity of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)-infected pulmonary intravascular macrophages (PIMs).

R Thanawongnuwech1, E L Thacker, P G Halbur.   

Abstract

Twelve pigs (six 4-week-old and six 4-month-old cross-bred, specific pathogen free pigs) were used as donors for both pulmonary intravascular macrophages (PIMs) and pulmonary alveolar macrophages (PAMs). The PIMs and PAMs were infected in vitro with low (ISU-55) or high (VR-2385) virulence strains of PRRSV at 1 multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.) for comparisons of virus titers at 48 h post infection (PI). PIMs were as permissive as PAMs to infection with both PRRSV isolates yielding similar progeny titers (10(4.81) vs. 10(5.22) TCID50/ml, respectively). Both ISU-55 and VR-2385 were able to infect PIMs and no significant difference in virus replication as measured by virus titers between isolates was found (10(5.33) vs. 10(4.69) TCID50/ml, respectively). PIMs from 4-weak-old pigs yielded a higher virus titer following PRRSV infection than PIMs from 4-month-old pigs (10(5.43) vs. 10(4.59) TCID50/ml, respectively; p < 0.02). VR-2385-infected PIMs had significantly decreased bactericidal (Staphylococcus aureus) activity compared with uninfected PIMS at 48 h PI (p < 0.05). There was no difference in bactericidal activity between ISU-55 (low virulence)-infected PIMs and VR-2385 (high virulence)-infected PIMs. Both ISU-55 and VR-2385 infection significantly decreased the production of superoxide anion (SOA) at 24 and 48 h PI (p < 0.01). In conclusion, (1) PRRSV had a detrimental effect on bactericidal activity and SOA production of PIMs, (2) PIMs from younger pigs were more permissive to PRRSV infection, and (3) the selected PRRSV strains, which differ in their abilities to induce pneumonia in vivo were not different when tested in vitro by measuring virus titer and bactericidal functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9850997     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(98)00245-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  10 in total

1.  Efficacy of antimicrobial treatments and vaccination regimens for control of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and Streptococcus suis coinfection of nursery pigs.

Authors:  P Halbur; R Thanawongnuwech; G Brown; J Kinyon; J Roth; E Thacker; B Thacker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Dynamic changes in inflammatory cytokines in pigs infected with highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Authors:  Yonggang Liu; Wenda Shi; Enmin Zhou; Shujie Wang; Shouping Hu; Xuehui Cai; Fulong Rong; Jiabin Wu; Min Xu; Mingming Xu; Liqin Li
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-07-14

3.  A total infectome approach to understand the etiology of infectious disease in pigs.

Authors:  Xinyi Huang; Weichen Wu; Xiaoxiao Tian; Xin Hou; Xingyang Cui; Yihong Xiao; Qiulin Jiao; Pei Zhou; Liqiang Liu; Weilin Shi; Ligong Chen; Yue Sun; Yongbo Yang; Jianxin Chen; Guihong Zhang; Jinling Liu; Edward C Holmes; Xuehui Cai; Tongqing An; Mang Shi
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 16.837

4.  Pathogenesis and antigenic characterization of a new East European subtype 3 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolate.

Authors:  Uladzimir U Karniychuk; Marc Geldhof; Merijn Vanhee; Jan Van Doorsselaere; Tamara A Saveleva; Hans J Nauwynck
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  In-depth global analysis of transcript abundance levels in porcine alveolar macrophages following infection with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Authors:  Laura C Miller; John D Neill; Gregory P Harhay; Kelly M Lager; William W Laegreid; Marcus E Kehrli
Journal:  Adv Virol       Date:  2011-01-12

6.  Comparison of host genetic factors influencing pig response to infection with two North American isolates of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Authors:  Andrew S Hess; Zeenath Islam; Melanie K Hess; Raymond R R Rowland; Joan K Lunney; Andrea Doeschl-Wilson; Graham S Plastow; Jack C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 7.  Review on the transmission porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus between pigs and farms and impact on vaccination.

Authors:  Emanuela Pileri; Enric Mateu
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.683

8.  Activation of regulated cell death in the lung of piglets infected with virulent PRRSV-1 Lena strain occurs earlier and mediated by cleaved Caspase-8.

Authors:  Jose María Sánchez-Carvajal; Inés Ruedas-Torres; Irene Magdalena Rodríguez-Gómez; Jaime Gómez-Laguna; Librado Carrasco; Francisco José Pallarés; Enric Mateu
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.683

9.  Efficacy of Fostera® PRRS modified live virus (MLV) vaccination strategy against a Thai highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (HP-PRRSV) infection.

Authors:  Ponlakrit Charoenchanikran; Roongtham Kedkovid; Chaitawat Sirisereewan; Yonlayong Woonwong; Jirapat Arunorat; Panchan Sitthichareonchai; Natthawan Sopipan; Suphattra Jittimanee; Sawang Kesdangsakonwut; Roongroje Thanawongnuwech
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 1.893

10.  In Vitro Virucidal and Virustatic Properties of the Crude Extract of Cynodon dactylon against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus.

Authors:  Kidsadagon Pringproa; Oapkun Khonghiran; Suchaya Kunanoppadol; Teerapong Potha; Phongsakorn Chuammitri
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2014-03-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.