Literature DB >> 9850776

The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI).

A Kirkley1, S Griffin, H McLintock, L Ng.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a valid, reliable, and responsive disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for patients with shoulder instability. Development included 1) identification of a specific patient population; 2) generation of issues specific to the "disease" ("items") from reviewing the literature, interviewing health caregivers, and interviewing patients representing all demographics, disease type and severity, and treatments; 3) item reduction using patient-generated frequency-importance products and correlation matrices; and 4) pretesting the prototype instrument on 2 groups of 10 patients. The final instrument, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, has 21 items representing 4 domains. The instrument attributes (validity, reliability, and responsiveness) were evaluated. Construct validation demonstrated that this index correlated predictably with other measures. Reliability was very high at 2 weeks and 3 months, and the index was more responsive (sensitive to change) than five other shoulder measurement tools (the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale; The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form; the UCLA Shoulder Rating Scale; the Constant Score; and the Rowe Rating Scale), a global health instrument (the SF12), and range of motion. Since the patient's perception of changes in health status is the most important indicator of the success of a treatment, we suggest that this measurement tool be used as the primary outcome measure to evaluate treatments in this patient population, although it can also be used for monitoring patients' progress in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9850776     DOI: 10.1177/03635465980260060501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  151 in total

1.  On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation.

Authors:  C B Terwee; F W Dekker; W M Wiersinga; M F Prummel; P M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Development and reliability testing of the frequency, etiology, direction, and severity (FEDS) system for classifying glenohumeral instability.

Authors:  John E Kuhn; Tara T Helmer; Warren R Dunn; Thomas W Throckmorton V
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Responsiveness of the QuickDASH and SF-12 in workers with neck or upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Z Joyce Fan; Caroline K Smith; Barbara A Silverstein
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-06

4.  The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index.

Authors:  Ozlem El; Cigdem Bircan; Selmin Gulbahar; Yucel Demiral; Ebru Sahin; Meltem Baydar; Ramazan Kizil; Sharon Griffin; Elif Akalin
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  The surgical outcome of immediate arthroscopic Bankart repair for first time anterior shoulder dislocation in young active patients.

Authors:  Billy Kan-Yip Law; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung; Eric Po-Yan Ho; Joseph Jeremy Hsi-Tse Chang; Kai-Ming Chan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Arthroscopic double bone block augmentation is a salvage procedure for anterior and posterior shoulder instability secondary to glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  David Haeni; Matthieu Sanchez; Plath Johannes; Lilling Victoria; Dan Henderson; Jeremy Munji; Kalojan Petkin; Laurent Lafosse
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  [Conservative therapy of acute locked posterior shoulder dislocation: clinical and radiological long-term results].

Authors:  J Wolke; D Krüger; C Gerhardt; M Scheibel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Performance of PROMIS Global-10 Compared With Legacy Instruments for Rotator Cuff Disease.

Authors:  Allen D Nicholson; Hafiz F Kassam; Steven D Pan; Jacob E Berman; Theodore A Blaine; David Kovacevic
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Using disablement models and clinical outcomes assessment to enable evidence-based athletic training practice, part II: clinical outcomes assessment.

Authors:  Tamara C Valovich McLeod; Alison R Snyder; John T Parsons; R Curtis Bay; Lori A Michener; Eric L Sauers
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  A shortened version of the Western ontario rotator cuff disability index: development and measurement properties.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Paul Stratford; Richard Holtby
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 1.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.