Literature DB >> 9850472

Occupational gender segregation: index measurement and econometric modeling.

M Watts1.   

Abstract

Empirical studies of gender segregation by occupation must be founded on rigorous measurement procedures. There appears to be a consensus that any index used in the analysis of time-series or international cross-section employment data must be either margin-free or decomposable to yield a margin-free component. On the other hand, Charles and Grusky (1995) advocate the use of multiplicative log models from which a margin-free odds ratio can be derived. In this paper, I contrast the construction and interpretation of the index of dissimilarity and the Karmel-MacLachlan index with the multiplicative modeling of gender segregation and the associated log index.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9850472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Demography        ISSN: 0070-3370


  1 in total

1.  Segregation and diversity measures in population distribution.

Authors:  M J White
Journal:  Popul Index       Date:  1986
  1 in total
  4 in total

1.  The analysis of sex segregation: when is index measurement not index measurement?

Authors:  M Watts
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1998-11

2.  The past, present, and future of sex segregation methodology.

Authors:  D B Grusky; M Charles
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1998-11

3.  Multi-way multi-group segregation and diversity indices.

Authors:  Root Gorelick; Susan M Bertram
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Rethinking gender segregation and gender inequality: measures and meanings.

Authors:  William P Bridges
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2003-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.