PURPOSE: To determine whether the first day review is essential in management of patients following uncomplicated phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation. Patients are routinely seen on the day following surgery. This can produce logistical problems in patient attendance that can necessitate an overnight stay. If the first day review were abandoned this would lead to an increased uptake of day case surgery and a reduction in health care costs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on all cases of uncomplicated phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implant surgery over a 6 month period. Slit lamp examination findings on the first post-operative day were reviewed. Visual acuity, corneal clarity, anterior chamber activity, intraocular pressure and configuration of the pupil were recorded. Any cases that failed to meet predetermined criteria underwent full case-note review. The subsequent management of these patients was analysed. RESULTS: Of the 201 cases of uncomplicated surgery, 74 cases (37%) failed to meet the study criteria and underwent review. Of these only 12 (6%) had their management altered as a result of the first day post-operative findings. This was entirely due to raised intraocular pressure. Visual acuity, corneal oedema and activity in the anterior chamber all improved on subsequent follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The first day review of uncomplicated phacoemulsification with lens implant surgery provides the opportunity to treat raised intraocular pressure. A prospective randomised study is needed to identify means to prevent the post-operative intraocular pressure rise before we are able to consider abandoning the first review.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the first day review is essential in management of patients following uncomplicated phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation. Patients are routinely seen on the day following surgery. This can produce logistical problems in patient attendance that can necessitate an overnight stay. If the first day review were abandoned this would lead to an increased uptake of day case surgery and a reduction in health care costs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on all cases of uncomplicated phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implant surgery over a 6 month period. Slit lamp examination findings on the first post-operative day were reviewed. Visual acuity, corneal clarity, anterior chamber activity, intraocular pressure and configuration of the pupil were recorded. Any cases that failed to meet predetermined criteria underwent full case-note review. The subsequent management of these patients was analysed. RESULTS: Of the 201 cases of uncomplicated surgery, 74 cases (37%) failed to meet the study criteria and underwent review. Of these only 12 (6%) had their management altered as a result of the first day post-operative findings. This was entirely due to raised intraocular pressure. Visual acuity, corneal oedema and activity in the anterior chamber all improved on subsequent follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The first day review of uncomplicated phacoemulsification with lens implant surgery provides the opportunity to treat raised intraocular pressure. A prospective randomised study is needed to identify means to prevent the post-operative intraocular pressure rise before we are able to consider abandoning the first review.