Literature DB >> 9850126

Completeness of ascertainment of prenatal smoking using birth certificates and confidential questionnaires: variations by maternal attributes and infant birth weight. PRAMS Working Group. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

P M Dietz1, M M Adams, J S Kendrick, M P Mathis.   

Abstract

Birth certificate data frequently are used to monitor the prevalence of smoking during pregnancy. The authors used a two-sample capture-recapture method to estimate the completeness of ascertainment of prenatal smoking on birth certificates and on confidential questionnaires in six US states. Completeness of ascertainment was also examined according to maternal attributes and infant birth weight. The samples included white women who delivered a live infant between 1993 and 1995 in one of six states (Alabama, Alaska, Georgia, Maine, South Carolina, or West Virginia) and who responded to a questionnaire mailed to them 2-6 months postpartum as part of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. State-specific sample sizes ranged from 2,647 to 4,795. The completeness of ascertainment ranged from 70.6% to 82.0% using birth certificates and from 86.2% to 90.3% using confidential questionnaires. In all six states, the birth certificates' completeness of ascertainment varied by maternal education and infant birth weight, and the questionnaires' completeness varied by maternal age. Both birth certificates and questionnaires underestimated the true extent of smoking during pregnancy among these white women. Differential reporting by birth weights recorded on birth certificates would result in an overestimated association between low birth weight and prenatal smoking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9850126     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  29 in total

1.  A method to guide community planning and evaluation efforts in tobacco control using data on smoking during pregnancy.

Authors:  V H Newburn; P L Remington; P E Peppard
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Adapting the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring survey to enhance locally available data: methods.

Authors:  Ann M Dozier; Elizabeth Brownell; Joseph Guido; Hongmei Yang; Cynthia A Howard; Andrew Doniger; Deborah Ossip; Ruth Lawrence
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-07

3.  Maternal Chlamydia Infection During Pregnancy and Risk of Cyanotic Congenital Heart Defects in the Offspring.

Authors:  Diane Y Dong; José N Binongo; Vijaya Kancherla
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-01

4.  Maternal exposure to fine particulate pollution during narrow gestational periods and newborn health in Harris County, Texas.

Authors:  Elaine Symanski; Marivel Davila; Michelle Karpman McHugh; Dorothy Kim Waller; Xuan Zhang; Dejian Lai
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-10

5.  Three maternal risk factors associated with elevated risk of postneonatal mortality among Alaska native population.

Authors:  Margaret H Blabey; Bradford D Gessner
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-04-04

6.  Accuracy of prenatal smoking data from Washington State birth certificates in a population-based sample with cotinine measurements.

Authors:  Susan Searles Nielsen; Russell L Dills; Michael Glass; Beth A Mueller
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  Agreement between self-report and birth certificate for gestational diabetes mellitus: New York State PRAMS.

Authors:  Akiko S Hosler; Seema G Nayak; Anne M Radigan
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2010-09

8.  Prenatal smoking prevalence ascertained from two population-based data sources: birth certificates and PRAMS questionnaires, 2004.

Authors:  Alicia M Allen; Patricia M Dietz; Van T Tong; Lucinda England; Cheryl B Prince
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy and offspring externalizing behavioral problems: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Brian B Boutwell; Kevin M Beaver
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Prenatal care utilization in Mississippi: racial disparities and implications for unfavorable birth outcomes.

Authors:  Reagan G Cox; Lei Zhang; Marianne E Zotti; Juanita Graham
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.