PURPOSE: To assess treatment-related myelodysplasia/leukemia (t-AML) in neuroblastoma patients by a review of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) data and the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 380 previously untreated and treated MSKCC patients. Low-risk patients received no cytotoxic therapy. High-risk patients received the N4, N5, or N6 regimens. Dosing per cycle and cumulative dosing of leukemogenic agents peaked with N6, which included four cycles of cyclophosphamide 4,200 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 75 mg/m2, plus three cycles of cisplatin 200 mg/m2 and etoposide 600 mg/m2. We reviewed the literature. RESULTS: t-AML occurred in six MSKCC patients, which included three of 53 patients in whom the only chemotherapy consisted of N6, and three patients treated for relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma; no case of leukemia emerged among the 50 low-risk patients. Four cases were found incidentally in routine follow-up bone marrow tests. The 36-month cumulative incidence of t-AML in the N6 cohort was 7% (95% confidence interval, 0 to 15). Published data parallel the MSKCC experience in that t-AML after neuroblastoma was once rare but has become less so since the mid-1980s, when the intensified use of topoisomerase-II inhibitors and alkylators first gained wide acceptance and produced better response rates and longer survival. CONCLUSION: Neuroblastoma itself is not associated with a host susceptibility to leukemia. However, current neuroblastoma treatment programs that use high-dose cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and topoisomerase-II inhibitors may entail a considerable risk for t-AML. The incidence of t-AML in neuroblastoma patients may be underestimated because treatment and clinical factors can mask its presence. Efforts to devise effective but less leukemogenic treatment for neuroblastoma or to truncate leukemogenic therapy, eg, by exploiting molecular techniques for the early identification of complete remission, are warranted.
PURPOSE: To assess treatment-related myelodysplasia/leukemia (t-AML) in neuroblastomapatients by a review of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) data and the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 380 previously untreated and treated MSKCC patients. Low-risk patients received no cytotoxic therapy. High-risk patients received the N4, N5, or N6 regimens. Dosing per cycle and cumulative dosing of leukemogenic agents peaked with N6, which included four cycles of cyclophosphamide 4,200 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 75 mg/m2, plus three cycles of cisplatin 200 mg/m2 and etoposide 600 mg/m2. We reviewed the literature. RESULTS: t-AML occurred in six MSKCC patients, which included three of 53 patients in whom the only chemotherapy consisted of N6, and three patients treated for relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma; no case of leukemia emerged among the 50 low-risk patients. Four cases were found incidentally in routine follow-up bone marrow tests. The 36-month cumulative incidence of t-AML in the N6 cohort was 7% (95% confidence interval, 0 to 15). Published data parallel the MSKCC experience in that t-AML after neuroblastoma was once rare but has become less so since the mid-1980s, when the intensified use of topoisomerase-II inhibitors and alkylators first gained wide acceptance and produced better response rates and longer survival. CONCLUSION:Neuroblastoma itself is not associated with a host susceptibility to leukemia. However, current neuroblastoma treatment programs that use high-dose cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and topoisomerase-II inhibitors may entail a considerable risk for t-AML. The incidence of t-AML in neuroblastomapatients may be underestimated because treatment and clinical factors can mask its presence. Efforts to devise effective but less leukemogenic treatment for neuroblastoma or to truncate leukemogenic therapy, eg, by exploiting molecular techniques for the early identification of complete remission, are warranted.
Authors: M D Megonigal; N K Cheung; E F Rappaport; P C Nowell; R B Wilson; D H Jones; K Addya; D G Leonard; B H Kushner; T M Williams; B J Lange; C A Felix Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-03-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Brian H Kushner; Nai-Kong V Cheung; Christopher A Barker; Kim Kramer; Shakeel Modak; Karima Yataghene; Suzanne L Wolden Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-05-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Chana L Glasser; Alice Lee; Don Eslin; Lianna Marks; Shakeel Modak; Julia L Glade Bender Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 1.289
Authors: Brian H Kushner; Kim Kramer; Shakeel Modak; Li-Xuan Qin; Karima Yataghena; Suresh C Jhanwar; Nai-Kong V Cheung Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Jinesh S Gheeya; Qing-Rong Chen; Christopher D Benjamin; Adam T Cheuk; Patricia Tsang; Joon-Yong Chung; Belhu B Metaferia; Thomas C Badgett; Peter Johansson; Jun S Wei; Stephen M Hewitt; Javed Khan Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2009-12-27 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Brian H Kushner; Michael P Laquaglia; Kim Kramer; Shakeel Modak; Nai-Kong V Cheung Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Paul R van Ginkel; William Yang; Marcus M Marcet; Clement C Chow; Amol D Kulkarni; Soesiawati Darjatmoko; Mary J Lindstrom; Janice Lokken; Saswati Bhattacharya; Daniel M Albert Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2007-06-30 Impact factor: 4.130