Literature DB >> 9850021

Prognostic value of immunophenotypic detection of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

J Ciudad1, J F San Miguel, M C López-Berges, B Vidriales, B Valverde, M Ocqueteau, G Mateos, M D Caballero, J Hernández, M J Moro, M V Mateos, A Orfao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The identification of immunophenotypic aberrancies through multiparametric flow cytometry makes the differentiation between normal and leukemic cells relatively simple and quick, and is therefore an attractive method for the investigation of minimal residual disease (MRD). In this report, we have analyzed the impact on relapse and relapse-free survival (RFS) of detecting immunophenotypical aberrant cells in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients in cytomorphologic complete remission (CR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred eleven bone marrow (BM) samples from 53 consecutive ALL (37 precursor B-ALL and 16 T-ALL) patients were analyzed. The only selection criteria were to have at least one aberrant immunophenotypic feature at diagosis and to have achieved cytomorphologic CR after induction therapy. For MRD detection, all follow-up samples were analyzed with triple labelings using a two-step acquisition procedure, in which 106 cells were screened for the possible persistence of residual leukemic cells with the same phenotypic aberrancy as that identified diagnosis.
RESULTS: Patients who displayed a gradual increase in MRD levels showed a higher relapse rate (90% v22%; P < .00001) and shorter median RFS (12 months v not reached; P < .0001) than those with stable or decreasing MRD levels. This adverse prognostic influence also was observed when children and adults, as well as B-ALL and T-ALL patients, were analyzed separately. An MRD level > or = or greater than 10(-3) discriminated two risk groups of ALL patients with significantly different relapse rates and RFS at all treatment phases (end of induction, consolidation, maintenance, and out of treatment).
CONCLUSION: Multiparametric flow cytometry of MRD in ALL patients is a valuable tool for relapse prediction and for the identification of a cohort of patients with very poor prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9850021     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.12.3774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  13 in total

1.  Bridging the gap between the north and south of the world: the case of treatment response in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Martin Stanulla; André Schrauder
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 2.  Minimal residual disease diagnostics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: need for sensitive, fast, and standardized technologies.

Authors:  Jacques J M van Dongen; Vincent H J van der Velden; Monika Brüggemann; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Monitoring minimal/measurable residual disease in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia by flow cytometry during targeted therapy.

Authors:  Zhiyu Liu; Yang Li; Ce Shi
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Low platelet counts after induction therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia are strongly associated with poor early response to treatment as measured by minimal residual disease and are prognostic for treatment outcome.

Authors:  Lutz Zeidler; Martin Zimmermann; Anja Möricke; Barbara Meissner; Dorothee Bartels; Christoph Tschan; André Schrauder; Gunnar Cario; Lilia Goudeva; Sarah Jäger; Richard Ratei; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Andrea Teigler-Schlegel; Julia Skokowa; Rolf Koehler; Claus R Bartram; Hansjörg Riehm; Martin Schrappe; Karl Welte; Martin Stanulla
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 5.  Immunologic minimal residual disease detection in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comparative approach to molecular testing.

Authors:  Elaine Coustan-Smith; Dario Campana
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its relationship to other prognostic factors: a Children's Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Michael J Borowitz; Meenakshi Devidas; Stephen P Hunger; W Paul Bowman; Andrew J Carroll; William L Carroll; Stephen Linda; Paul L Martin; D Jeanette Pullen; David Viswanatha; Cheryl L Willman; Naomi Winick; Bruce M Camitta
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  A unique complex translocation involving six different chromosomes in a case of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Philadelphia chromosome and adverse prognosis.

Authors:  Walid Al Achkar; Abdulsamad Wafa; Hasmik Mkrtchyan; Faten Moassass; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Monitoring of acute myeloid leukemia by flow cytometry.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kern; Susanne Schnittger
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 9.  Immunologic monitoring in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  María-Belén Vidriales; Alberto Orfao; Jesús F San-Miguel
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Establishment and validation of a standard protocol for the detection of minimal residual disease in B lineage childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia by flow cytometry in a multi-center setting.

Authors:  Julie Irving; Jenny Jesson; Paul Virgo; Marian Case; Lynne Minto; Lisa Eyre; Nigel Noel; Ulrika Johansson; Marion Macey; Linda Knotts; Margaret Helliwell; Paul Davies; Liam Whitby; David Barnett; Jeremy Hancock; Nick Goulden; Sarah Lawson
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 9.941

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.