Literature DB >> 9849758

Pelvic floor electrical stimulation for genuine stress incontinence: who will benefit and when?

K Miller1, D A Richardson, S W Siegel, M M Karram, N B Blackwood, P K Sand.   

Abstract

This study sought to determine the characteristics of women in whom pelvic floor electrical stimulation will reduce stress urinary incontinence. It also evaluates how long electrical stimulation should be used before significant improvements are seen in clinical outcomes. Subjects with genuine stress incontinence were enrolled into a multicenter non-randomized trial. They used electrical stimulation for 15 minutes twice daily or every other day for 20 weeks. At the end of 20 weeks, those with a 50% reduction in leakage episodes on voiding diary ('responders') were compared with those who did not show a 50% reduction ('non-responders'). Thirty-one subjects were enrolled and 28 completed the study. After the treatment period, 19 subjects were defined as responders and 9 as non-responders. There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline demographics (e.g. age, parity, largest birth weight etc.) other than body mass index (greater in nonresponders). Significant subjective and objective improvements were noted among responders by 10 and 14 weeks, respectively. Compliance was higher in responders during weeks 12-15 of the study (P=0.05). It was concluded that a minimum of 14 weeks of pelvic floor stimulation was necessary before significant objective improvements were seen. Body mass index and patient compliance may affect success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9849758     DOI: 10.1007/bf01901503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  20 in total

1.  The electrical control of sphincter incompetence.

Authors:  K P CALDWELL
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1963-07-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Pelvic floor electrical stimulation: a comparison of daily and every-other-day therapy for genuine stress incontinence.

Authors:  D A Richardson; K L Miller; S W Siegel; M M Karram; N B Blackwood; D R Staskin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Intravaginal electrical stimulation. Clinical experiments on bladder inhibition.

Authors:  M Fall; B E Erlandson; T Sundin; F Waagstein
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  1977

4.  Treatment of urinary incontinence by electric pessary. A report of 18 patients.

Authors:  S Alexander; D Rowan; W Millar; R Scott
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1970-04

5.  Analysis and control of the current distribution under circular dispersive electrodes.

Authors:  J D Wiley; J G Webster
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Psychosocial impact of urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  J F Wyman; S W Harkins; S C Choi; J R Taylor; J A Fantl
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Pelvic muscle reeducation as a nursing treatment for incontinence.

Authors:  D K Newman; D A Smith
Journal:  Urol Nurs       Date:  1992-03

8.  Contelle: pelvic floor stimulator for female stress-urge incontinence. A multicenter study.

Authors:  M Fall; K Ahlstrom; C A Carlsson; A Ek; B E Erlandson; S Frankenberg; A Mattiasson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Does electrostimulation cure urinary incontinence?

Authors:  M Fall
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  An objective assessment of physiotherapy for female genuine stress incontinence.

Authors:  P D Wilson; T Al Samarrai; M Deakin; E Kolbe; A D Brown
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1987-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Efficacy of magnetic stimulation for female stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai Sun; Dongxu Zhang; Gang Wu; Tianqi Wang; JiTao Wu; Hongxu Ren; Yuanshan Cui
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2021-07-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.