Literature DB >> 9848695

Anthropometric differences in macrosomic infants of diabetic and nondiabetic mothers.

M B McFarland1, C G Trylovich, O Langer.   

Abstract

The objective was to investigate the hypothesis that anthropometric and body composition differences exist between macrosomic infants of diabetic and nondiabetic mothers. Sixteen infants of mothers with diabetes, along with 58 control infants, were studied within 24 hours of delivery. The following measurements were obtained: birthweight, birth length and extremity length; circumferences of the head, chest, shoulders, and extremities; and triceps, subscapular, flank, and thigh skinfolds. Estimation of fat mass and calculation of percent body fat was performed according to the Dauncey method. Macrosomic infants of diabetic mothers were characterized by larger shoulder and extremity circumferences, a decreased head-to-shoulder ratio, significantly higher body fat, and thicker upper extremity skinfolds compared with nondiabetic control infants of similar birthweight and birth length. Differences in body composition and weight distribution may explain the propensity for shoulder dystocia in the diabetic population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9848695     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199811/12)7:6<292::AID-MFM7>3.0.CO;2-A

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Med        ISSN: 1057-0802


  24 in total

1.  Association of head circumference and shoulder dystocia in macrosomic neonates.

Authors:  Austin Larson; David E Mandelbaum
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-04

2.  Metabolic flexibility during late pregnancy is associated with neonatal adiposity.

Authors:  Rachel A Tinius; Maire M Blankenship; Karen E Furgal; W Todd Cade; Cathryn Duchette; Kevin J Pearson; Jill M Maples
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.665

3.  Risk factors profile of shoulder dystocia in oman: a case control study.

Authors:  Maha M Al-Khaduri; Rania Mohammed Abudraz; Sayed G Rizvi; Yahya M Al-Farsi
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2014-09

4.  Shoulder dystocia: an Evidence-Based approach.

Authors:  Salvatore Politi; Laura Dʼemidio; Pietro Cignini; Maurizio Giorlandino; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2010-07

5.  Maternal metabolic response to dietary treatment for impaired glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Karen L Lindsay; Lorraine Brennan; Maria A Kennelly; Sinéad Curran; Mary Coffey; Thomas P Smith; Michael E Foley; Mensud Hatunic; Fionnuala M McAuliffe
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Which way is better to deliver the very heavy baby: mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal outcome.

Authors:  Gabriel Levin; Raanan Meyer; Simcha Yagel; Mankuta David; Yoav Yinon; Amihai Rottenstreich
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 7.  Maternal metabolism and obesity: modifiable determinants of pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Scott M Nelson; Phillippa Matthews; Lucilla Poston
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 15.610

8.  The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women who are overweight or obese.

Authors:  Chaturica Athukorala; Alice R Rumbold; Kristyn J Willson; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  A modified prenatal growth assessment score for the evaluation of fetal growth in the third trimester using single and composite biometric parameters.

Authors:  Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Adi L Tarca; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2014-07-11

10.  The relationship between maternal and fetal vitamin D, insulin resistance, and fetal growth.

Authors:  Jennifer M Walsh; Ciara A McGowan; Mark Kilbane; Malachi J McKenna; Fionnuala M McAuliffe
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.